ARTICLE
28 April 2022

浅谈外观设计专利与在先商标权冲突的审查标准

CP
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office

Contributor

CCPIT PATENT AND TRADEMARK LAW OFFICE is the oldest and one of the largest full-service intellectual property law firms in China. Our firm has 322 patent and trademark attorneys, among whom 93 are qualified as attorneys-at-law. We provide consultation, prosecution, mediation, administrative enforcement and litigation services relating to patents, trademarks, copyrights, domain names, trade secrets, trade dress, unfair competition and other intellectual property-related matters. headquartered in Beijing, we have branch offices in New York, Silicon Valley, Tokyo, Munich, Madrid, Hongkong, Shanghai,Guangzhou and Shenzhen.
《专利法》第23条第3款规定了外观设计专利与在先权利的冲突,包括与在先商标权的冲突。如果在同一种商品或者类似商品的外观设计中采用了&
China Intellectual Property
CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office are most popular:
  • within Compliance topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & BioTech and Retail & Leisure industries

《专利法》第23条第3款规定了外观设计专利与在先权利的冲突,包括与在先商标权的冲突。如果在同一种商品或者类似商品的外观设计中采用了与他人注册商标相同或者近似的标识,使得外观设计专利权的实施可能会使相关公众误认为商品来自于商标权人,进而损害商标权人的合法权利,则构成外观设计专利权与在先商标权的冲突,这种冲突的判断标准实质上是审查外观设计专利权的实施是否会侵犯到商标权。

侵权标准提供了一种"全有或全无"的解决权利冲突的方案。由于没有进一步细分权利冲突的具体情形,也未充分考虑知识产权不同于有体物的特性,导致在后创新主体的创造性贡献无法得到应有的保护。

文章正文请点击此处。

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More