ARTICLE
25 April 2016

Retrospectively Or Not Retrospectively - That Is The Question

MT
Miller Thomson LLP

Contributor

Miller Thomson LLP (“Miller Thomson”) is a national business law firm with approximately 500 lawyers across 5 provinces in Canada. The firm offers a full range of services in litigation and disputes, and provides business law expertise in mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and securities, financial services, tax, restructuring and insolvency, trade, real estate, labour and employment as well as a host of other specialty areas. Clients rely on Miller Thomson lawyers to provide practical advice and exceptional value. Miller Thomson offices are located in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Regina, Saskatoon, London, Waterloo Region, Toronto, Vaughan and Montréal. For more information, visit millerthomson.com. Follow us on X and LinkedIn to read our insights on the latest legal and business developments.
The issue of whether the recent amendments to Ontario's Insurance Act dealing with the indexation of the statutory deductible to inflation was recently before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice...
Canada Insurance

The issue of whether the recent amendments to Ontario's Insurance Act dealing with the indexation of the statutory deductible to inflation was recently before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Corbett v. Odorico, 2016 ONSC 1964 (CanLII).  

Following a six week jury trial, the Plaintiff, who was injured in a December 5, 2009 motor vehicle accident, was awarded $33,000 in general damages.  After finding that the Plaintiff had satisfied the verbal threshold, Justice Hackland considered whether the recent amendments to the Insurance Act indexing the statutory deductible to inflation applied retrospectively to ongoing motor vehicle personal injury actions commenced before the August 1, 2015 amendments took effect. Justice Hackland agreed with the defendant that a regulation varying the amount of the deductible for fixed annual periods is procedural in nature and, as such, applies retrospectively.  In Justice Hackland's view, the amendments were designed to fix the deductible amount in "current dollars", just as jury verdicts and other court judgments are made in "current dollars".  Applying the new statutory deductible of $36,540, the Plaintiff was left with a nil recovery in respect of general damages. 

For those keeping score, two Judges of the Superior Court of Justice have held that the indexed deductible applies to ongoing motor vehicle personal injury actions commenced before August 1, 2015 vs. one that has found that the indexed deductible did not apply retrospectively.  Meanwhile, personal injury lawyers, both plaintiff and defence, and insurance industry professionals continue to anxiously await clarity of the issue from the Court of Appeal in relation to the appeal of El-Kohdr v. Lackie, 2015 ONSC 4766 (CanLII).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More