Curated
Rethinking Expert Testimony: The Case For Concurrent Evidence
Expert testimony is often the center of gravity in life sciences and technology disputes because patent, licensing and other commercial cases often turn on specialized scientific or technical questions. Yet the traditional method of presenting expert testimony—one side presents its expert, the expert is examined and cross-examined and, days later, the opposing expert goes through the same process—is not always well suited to resolving these questions. By the time the second expert addresses a point made by the first, the tribunal is comparing testimony delivered at different times, in response to different questions and sometimes using different terminology or assumptions. And much of what the experts have to say is really not in dispute.
JAMS