ARTICLE
15 November 2024

TruGrp v. Karmina: Returning Clarity And Certainty To The Use Of Letters Of Credit To Vacate Construction Liens

BL
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Contributor

BLG is a leading, national, full-service Canadian law firm focusing on business law, commercial litigation, and intellectual property solutions for our clients. BLG is one of the country’s largest law firms with more than 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals in five cities across Canada.
In the Ontario Superior Court's decision of TruGrp v. Karmina, 2024 ONSC 2165, the Court adjourned TruGrp's motion challenging the adequacy of a letter of credit as security to vacate a claim for lien...
Canada Real Estate and Construction

In the Ontario Superior Court's decision of TruGrp v. Karmina, 2024 ONSC 2165, the Court adjourned TruGrp's motion challenging the adequacy of a letter of credit as security to vacate a claim for lien, pending submissions from the Accountant of the Superior Court (the Accountant) and the issuing bank, the Bank of Montreal. For more information on that decision, please see our previously published piece in the Daily Commercial News by ConstructConnect", "TruGrp v. Karmina – Uncertainty in the use of letters of credit to vacate construction liens?", from June 2024.

Recently, the Court released its endorsement in TruGrp v. Karmina, 2024 ONSC 4643, following up on this prior decision.

Details of the new decision

The Court noted that the Accountant and the Bank of Montreal provided written positions for the Court's review.

With respect to the language in the letter of credit that allowed the Bank of Montreal to decline renewal of the letter of credit upon 30 days' notice, the Accountant stated that a letter of credit with such language is acceptable security.

The Accountant also stated that a further court order with respect to the use of the bank draft as security would only be required in circumstances where the letter of credit is being replaced by a bank draft from a party other than the issuing bank. The Bank of Montreal agreed with the Accountant's position.

As a result of the Accountant's written position, TruGrp ultimately did not proceed with the motion.

Key takeaway

While the Court did not need to render a decision, the Accountant's position was clear that letters of credit with similar, commonly used renewal provisions are in fact valid security to vacate a claim for lien. This short endorsement provides much needed clarity and returns certainty to the use of letters of credit as security to vacate construction liens.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More