PRESS RELEASE
11 January 2022

Elizabeth Holmes’s Mixed Verdict Could Handicap An Appeal, Lawyers Say

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Christine Wong spoke to Wall Street Journal about the verdict of the Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial, where jurors’ careful deliberations will make it harder to argue that errors or bias affected the outcome.
United States

Christine Wong spoke to Wall Street Journal about the verdict of the Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial, where jurors' careful deliberations will make it harder to argue that errors or bias affected the outcome.

"The mixed verdict actually speaks to how careful the verdict really was," Christine said. "They really matched up the evidence against the specific claims."

According to Christine, finding one or two errors in a case related to evidence often isn't enough to win an appeal, because the higher court can decide there was enough evidence in favor of the conviction that the errors didn't matter.

Read the full article (subscription may be required).

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More