ARTICLE
22 July 2026

Federal Court Halts OBBBA TPS Work Authorization Changes, Preserving 540-Day Extensions

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 1,000 lawyers across 19 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
A federal court has temporarily paused the loss of work authorization for certain Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, creating immediate compliance implications for employers who were preparing to reverify or terminate affected employees. The ruling preserves previously available 540-day automatic EAD extensions while litigation proceeds, though the stay may be lifted by higher courts.
United States Immigration
Seyfarth Shaw LLP are most popular:
  • within Compliance topic(s)

As we noted last week, certain Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries were set to lose work authorization tomorrow under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). Earlier today, a federal court temporarily paused that change.

1821150a.jpg

What does this mean:

For now, employers should not reverify, suspend, or terminate employees based solely on the anticipated July 22 loss of TPS-related employment authorization under the OBBBA amendments. If an employee was already eligible to rely on a 540-day automatic extension of an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) before the law took effect, that automatic extension remains available while the court’s order is in place.

Specifically, previously extended TPS Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) remain valid until their earlier extension dates. This means TPS beneficiaries who presented an A12 or C19 EAD with a Form I-797C receipt may continue working for the full 540-day extension period, even if that date falls after July 22, 2026. This primarily impacts TPS beneficiaries who were relying on a previously available 540-day automatic extension of employment authorization

The court’s order appears to apply nationwide and is not limited to the individual plaintiffs. However, the order appears directed at preserving previously available 540-day automatic EAD extensions for eligible TPS beneficiaries and does not appear to restore employment authorization for TPS populations whose TPS designation has already been terminated

The stay is likely temporary and will remain in place while the court considers broader challenges to the agency’s actions, with a ruling expected by August 5, 2026. We cannot underscore enough the likelihood that this pause may be lifted by a higher court, similar to what we have seen with other TPS-related litigation.

What Changes for Employers?

Certain employees that were due to be terminated or suspended may continue to work if an employer previously accepted a TPS EAD and Form I-797C receipt notice showing eligibility for a 540-day automatic extension. The court’s order means that employers should continue honoring those previously valid automatic extensions unless and until further guidance or court action changes the landscape. Examples are below:

1821150b.jpg

Employer takeaway:

If you were preparing to reverify or terminate employment based on TPS-related work authorization expirations on July 22, you should immediately pause. For now, affected TPS beneficiaries may continue to rely on previously issued 540-day automatic extensions, and employers should not take adverse action based solely on the assumption that work authorization terminated under the OBBBA amendments.

At the same time, this litigation underscores the extraordinary volatility surrounding TPS work authorization. Employers should expect continued changes from US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the courts over the coming days and weeks, including the possibility that this stay could be lifted, or overturned on appeal. Human Resources, Immigration, and I-9 Compliance teams should carefully review any pending reverification or separation decisions involving TPS beneficiaries and confirm employee-specific expiration dates before taking action. As has become increasingly common in the TPS context, employers may need to adjust compliance processes on very short notice.

Looking Ahead

The lesson for employers remains the same: proceed cautiously and avoid relying on a single announcement, court ruling, or agency update in isolation. TPS-related work authorization has become a rapidly moving target, with significant consequences for both employees and employers. Organizations should continue monitoring developments closely, maintain flexibility in their I-9 and reverification processes, and consult counsel before implementing workforce actions tied to TPS employment authorization.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More