ARTICLE
13 February 2020

Eleventh Circuit Rejects Marks – Holds Device Is Not An ATDS Unless Random Or Sequential Number Generator Utilized

SP
Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Contributor

Squire Patton Boggs is a full service global law firm providing insight at the point where law, business and government meet, giving you a voice, supporting your ambitions and achieving successful outcomes.

With a multidisciplinary team of over 1,500 lawyers in over 40 offices across four continents, we are well-established geographically with strong local and regional positions in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and Latin America, and our practice experience spans all key sectors.

Well, we have some huge news to report – the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal held yesterday that an automated telephone dialing system for TCPA purposes requires the use of a random or...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Squire Patton Boggs LLP are most popular:
  • within Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Immigration and Criminal Law topic(s)
  • in Europe
  • with readers working within the Transport and Law Firm industries

Hi friends,

Well, we have some huge news to report – the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal held yesterday that an automated telephone dialing system for TCPA purposes requires the use of a random or sequential number generator.

The court specifically rejected the rational of Marks v. Crunch Gym and determined that the statutory definition of ATDS requires the use of a random or sequential number generator.

Tcpaworld.com will have full team coverage of the ruling and its likely impact across the nation. Stay tuned for more.

Thanks friends. Chat soon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More