ARTICLE
6 May 2019

Marketplace Lender Settles SEC Charges For Misreporting Annual Returns To Investors

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A Silicon Valley-based marketplace lender agreed to settle SEC charges for having "miscalculated and materially overstated" annualized net returns to investors.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

A Silicon Valley-based marketplace lender agreed to settle SEC charges for having "miscalculated and materially overstated" annualized net returns to investors.

Prosper Funding LLC ("Prosper") is a marketplace lender that (i) provides unsecured consumer loans to borrowers and (ii) issues securities that include notes connected to the performance of the consumer loans ("Prosper Securities"). According to the SEC Order, Prosper excluded from its return performance to investors on certain Prosper Securities connected to certain "charged-off consumer loans" that had been resold in the secondary market. This exclusion was due to a deficiency in the computer code used by Prosper to calculate its returns. The SEC claimed that Prosper neglected to correct the error, notwithstanding that its employees did not comprehend how the code underlying the annualized net returns calculation functioned and investors complaints. The SEC Order stated that as a result, Prosper miscalculated and overstated the annualized net returns to over 30,000 investors on their online account pages and in correspondence concerning investments in Prosper securities.

Without admitting or denying the charges, Prosper agreed to pay a $3 million penalty.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More