ARTICLE
28 January 2016

Standard For Indefiniteness In PGR Proceedings – Nautilus Or Packard?, PTAB Litigation Blog

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
In PGR2015-00018, Petitioner Telebrands Corp. filed a petition for post-grant review of claims 1-14 of U.S. Patent No. 9,051,066 (filed September 2014, issued June 2015).
United States Intellectual Property

In PGR2015-00018, Petitioner Telebrands Corp. filed a petition for post-grant review of claims 1-14 of U.S. Patent No. 9,051,066 (filed September 2014, issued June 2015). In the attached decision, described below, the Board instituted post-grant review, finding that the Petitioner had established a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its challenges to the claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 112 and 103.

The '066 patent is titled "System and Method for Filling Containers with Fluids," and describes an apparatus for filling multiple water balloons simultaneously:

Hollow tubes 16 fill the balloons 18 with water, and when the balloons 18 are "substantially filled" with water, a user can shake the tubes 16 to detach sealed balloons.

To read more, visit our PTAB Litigation Blog.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More