ARTICLE
8 October 2026

The Hidden Risks Of Sharing Company Data With AI Vendors

MF
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.

Contributor

Since its founding in 1929, Masuda Funai has focused its practice on successfully representing international and domestic companies entering, operating and expanding in the United States. With offices in Chicago, Schaumburg, Los Angeles and Detroit, the firm assists clients in every aspect of business, including establishing, acquiring, financing and selling operations and facilities; transferring overseas employees to the U.S.
As companies increasingly rely on third-party AI platforms to analyze documents and automate workflows, they often provide vendors with proprietary data and trade secrets. What legal risks arise when confidential business information is uploaded to AI systems, and how can organizations protect their intellectual property rights while capturing the benefits of these technologies?
United States Intellectual Property

As companies increasingly rely on third-party artificial intelligence platforms to analyze documents, automate workflows, and generate business insights, many are providing vendors with some of their most valuable assets: proprietary data. While these tools can offer significant efficiencies, businesses should understand what happens to their information once it is uploaded. Depending on the vendor's terms of service, company data may be retained, used to improve AI models, shared with subcontractors, or stored across multiple jurisdictions. Even where a vendor promises confidentiality, organizations risk exposing trade secrets, sensitive business information, customer data, or intellectual property if appropriate contractual safeguards are not in place.

The intellectual property implications can be particularly significant. Trade secret protection generally depends on maintaining reasonable measures to preserve secrecy. If confidential information is broadly shared with third-party AI providers without adequate restrictions, questions may arise regarding whether trade secret protections have been compromised. In addition, companies should carefully examine who owns AI-generated outputs, whether the vendor receives any rights in the uploaded data, and whether the vendor has agreed not to use customer information to train future models. Businesses operating in regulated industries should also consider privacy, cybersecurity, and data governance obligations that may apply when sensitive information is processed through AI systems.

Before adopting an AI-enabled service, companies should carefully review vendor agreements with a focus on data ownership, permitted uses, retention practices, security controls, indemnification provisions, and confidentiality obligations. A thoughtful assessment at the outset can help organizations capture the benefits of AI while minimizing the risk of unintended disclosure, loss of intellectual property rights, or future disputes over data and model outputs. Companies that have not recently evaluated their AI vendor contracts may wish to do so as AI technologies—and the legal risks surrounding them—continue to evolve.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More