ARTICLE
17 November 2015

The Latest Unsuccessful Inter Partes Review Petitions

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
While much invective has been thrown around concerning IPR proceedings in the past few years, the institution rate of IPRs continues to fall...
United States Intellectual Property

While much invective has been thrown around concerning IPR proceedings in the past few years, the institution rate of IPRs continues to fall, whether due to parties becoming savvy to proceedings, an improvement in the quality of patents being challenged, or due to developing statutory interpretations before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the Federal Circuit. It is still early days, and there are many aspects of IPRs that do not have judicial guidance yet. In this article, Finnegan attorneys  Thomas L. Irving and  Samhitha C. Muralidhar examine some threshold bases for IPR petition denial and current patent owners' success rates.

Previously published by Law360

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More