Anti-Fracking Bill Defeated In California Senate

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The California State Senate rejected a bill that would have put a moratorium on fracking until a state-commissioned study determined that it was safe.
United States Energy and Natural Resources

Yesterday, the California State Senate rejected a bill that would have put a moratorium on fracking until a state-commissioned study determined that it was safe.  The bill, Senate Bill 1132, would have prohibited all "well stimulation treatments"—including fracking and acid well stimulation—while requiring the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to commission an "independent scientific study" no later than June 30, 2016.  According to the bill, the study would have evaluated "the hazards and risks and potential hazards and risks that well stimulation treatments and well stimulation treatment-related activities pose to natural resources and public, occupational, and environmental health and safety."

Once the study was completed, the bill would have required the Governor to determine whether there were sufficient measures in place to address any adverse impacts identified in the study.  If the Governor determined that sufficient measures were not in place, the moratorium would have remained in place.  If the Governor determined that there were sufficient measures in place to address concerns, the moratorium would have terminated 90 days later.

The bill's sponsor, Senator Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) argued that the bill would hit the "pause" button on fracking because "the safety of oil drilling is an environmental justice issue" that she believes should be reviewed with "great scrutiny."  Opponents argued that the bill was unnecessary because California passed a law last year to regulate hydraulic fracking.  Opponents also argued that the bill would have led to a "heavy reduction of jobs."  The bill failed with an 18-16 vote, but the Senate left open the possibility that the bill could be reconsidered.

Coverage:

Fracking Moratorium Dies in State Senate

Calif. Senate vote falls short for moratorium on oil fracking

Bill text and analysis:

SB-1132 Oil and gas: well stimulation treatments

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More