In his weekly Realty Law Digest column (subscription required), Scott Mollen analyzes two cases. In Faison v. Lewis, the Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether a plaintiff's claim, which sought to set aside and cancel a defendant bank's mortgage on the grounds that the money had been lent in reliance on a forged deed, was time-barred. In Howard Avenue Development v. Richardson, the court found that the subject license agreement provisions were akin to a lease.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
