ARTICLE
27 December 2019

Broker Dealer Settles FINRA Charges For Supervisory Failures Over Best Execution

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to supervise the executing broker-dealers to which it sent orders to determine that they provided best...
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Government, Public Sector, Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Consumer Industries industries

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to supervise the executing broker-dealers to which it sent orders to determine that they provided best execution, as required FINRA Rule 5310 ("Best Execution and Interpositioning") for the broker-dealer's customers.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Robinhood Financial, LLC ("Robinhood") promised its customers commission-free trade execution. Robinhood received payment for order flow from the various firms to which it sent trades for execution. FINRA alleged that Robinhood failed to supervise adequately those firms to ensure they were actually providing quality executions for Robinhood's customers.

To settle the charges, Robinhood agreed to (i) a censure, (ii) a $1,250,000 fine and (iii) hire an independent consultant to conduct a review of the firm's supervisory systems.

Commentary

Conor Almquist

While receipt of payment for order flow is not a violation of the duty of best execution, FINRA and the SEC have emphasized that firms receiving such payments should carefully evaluate the potential impact on execution quality. This enforcement action is a reminder for firms that, especially under heightened scrutiny when receiving payment for order flow, execution quality should be regularly and substantively analyzed, including assessing the execution quality of potential alternative routing arrangements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More