ARTICLE
11 September 2026

Texas Department Of Banking Resolves Unlicensed Money Transmission Allegations

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On September 1, the Texas Department of Banking issued a consent order resolving allegations that an escrow service provider conducted money transmission activity in Texas without obtaining a license.
United States Texas Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Strategy and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On September 1, the Texas Department of Banking issued a consent order resolving allegations that an escrow service provider conducted money transmission activity in Texas without obtaining a license. The Department alleged that the conduct violated Chapter 152 of the Texas Finance Code, the Texas Money Services Modernization Act. The company agreed to the order without admitting any violation of state or federal law or regulation.

According to the order, the company provided escrow services involving the receipt of funds from purchasers and subsequent transmission of those funds to sellers.  Under the order, the company must cease conducting money transmission in Texas unless it is properly licensed or otherwise exempt from licensure.  The company also must pay at least $10,000 in administrative penalties through four quarterly installments. If it fails to make a required installment, the remaining balance of the full $20,716.22 penalty becomes due.

Putting It Into Practice: The action continues a broader trend of state regulators scrutinizing licensing and compliance obligations across consumer finance and money transmission (previously discussed here and here). Companies offering escrow, payment, or similar services should evaluate whether their transaction flows constitute money transmission under applicable state law, confirm that any claimed licensing exemptions apply to their specific activities, and update licensing and compliance procedures as necessary.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More