ARTICLE
15 January 2026

CFPB Brings Clarity To Earned Wage Access Products

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an advisory opinion on December 23, 2025, that resolves significant regulatory uncertainty surrounding whether earned wage access (EWA) products and are "credit" for purposes of Regulation Z, the Truth in Lending Act's (TILA) implementing regulation.
United States Finance and Banking
Allison Funk’s articles from Goodwin Procter LLP are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives and HR
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Law Firm and Construction & Engineering industries

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an advisory opinion on December 23, 2025, that resolves significant regulatory uncertainty surrounding whether earned wage access (EWA) products and are "credit" for purposes of Regulation Z, the Truth in Lending Act's (TILA) implementing regulation.

The advisory opinion establishes four critical characteristics that define "Covered EWA"—products it clarifies are not considered credit under Regulation Z: (i) transactions must be based on accrued wages using actual payroll data; (ii) use payroll process deductions; (iii) include no recourse against the worker if deductions are insufficient; (iv) and involve no credit risk assessment of individual workers.

According to the advisory opinion, Covered EWA is not credit because it does not provide workers with the right to defer payment of debt or to incur debt and defer its payment. The worker incurs no financial liability or obligation because Covered EWA facilitates access to wage amounts that workers have already earned and to which they are already entitled. The payroll process deduction serves to ensure the consumer is not effectively compensated twice for the same work, rather than representing repayment of a debt.

The opinion also notes that expedited delivery fees are generally not finance charges when consumers have a reasonable means for receiving payment without paying a fee, such as standard ACH transfer. However, if a provider makes it too difficult for consumers to select un-expedited delivery, the resulting fees may effectively be imposed and could qualify as finance charges.

Bona fide tips provided voluntarily by consumers cannot be finance charges, as it is inherent in the meaning of "tip" that it is not imposed. However, if tipping is not truly voluntary—for example, if the provider makes it too difficult to avoid tipping—the resulting payment may be imposed and qualify as a finance charge.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More