ARTICLE
15 October 2024

CFPB Permanently Bans Arbitration Company From Arbitrating Consumer Financial Disputes

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
On October 10, the CFPB settled an action against a California-based private arbitration company permanently banning it from arbitrating disputes related to consumer financial products or services.
United States California Finance and Banking

On October 10, the CFPB settled an action against a California-based private arbitration company permanently banning it from arbitrating disputes related to consumer financial products or services. The company operates an online dispute resolution platform that connects debtors with creditors for the purpose of resolving disputes and debts.

The enforcement action arose from the company's role as a service provider to a student income share agreement ("ISA") provider, which the CFPB and several state attorneys general shut down in 2023 for illegal lending practices. When the loan provider was under investigation, it unilaterally altered its contract terms to force consumers into arbitration with the company.

The Bureau found that the company misled student borrowers about its neutrality and initiated sham arbitration proceedings in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA). The CFPB's consent order enumerates the company's violations, which include:

  • Initiating arbitration proceedings without consumers' consent, knowing that it lacked jurisdiction, as the ISAs had no arbitration clause allowing the company's involvement;
  • Misleading borrowers regarding its neutrality and failing to disclose its affiliation with the ISA provider and that its financial interests were aligned with the provider;
  • Misrepresenting the nature of the proceedings and the consequences for borrowers' actions or inactions; and
  • Attempting to bind borrowers to its terms of service and platform rules, which restrict borrowers' means of legal defense.

Putting It Into Practice: The CFPA empowers the CFPB to enforce, not only against institutions offering consumer financial products or services, but also against their third-party service providers. This action underscores federal regulators' commitment to going after service providers as well as the provider of the consumer financial product or service. Notably, the defendant did not pay a civil money penalty beyond a nominal $1 fine which allows consumers to access relief from the Bureau's victim relief fund.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More