ARTICLE
25 October 2021

Broker-Dealer Settles FINRA Charges For Net Capital Deficiencies

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for net capital deficiencies, failing to notify the SEC or FINRA of the deficiencies in a timely manner, and inaccurate recordkeeping.
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, International Law, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for net capital deficiencies, failing to notify the SEC or FINRA of the deficiencies in a timely manner, and inaccurate recordkeeping.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA found that a broker-dealer violated SEA Rule 15c3-1 ("Net Capital Requirements for Brokers or Dealers") when it entered into a customer arbitration settlement that made it capital-deficient. Further, the broker-dealer continued its securities business while net capital-deficient and failed to give notice of its deficiency, in violation of Sections 15(c) and 17(a) ("Recordkeeping and Reporting") under the Exchange Act, SEA Rules 15c3-1 and 17a-11 ("Notification Provisions for Brokers and Dealers") thereunder, respectively, and FINRA Rules 4110(b) ("Capital Compliance") and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

In addition, FINRA found that the broker-dealer, in settling a separate customer arbitration for $73,000, failed to timely record the settlement, rendering its books and records inaccurate and causing the broker-dealer to file an inaccurate FOCUS report, in violation of SEA Section 17(a), SEA Rules 17a-3 ("Records to Be Made by Certain Exchange Members, Brokers and Dealers") and 17a-5 ("Reports to Be Made by Certain Brokers and Dealers") thereunder, and FINRA Rules 4511(a) ("General Requirements") and 2010.

To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to (i) a censure and (ii) a $20,000 fine.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More