ARTICLE
8 September 2025

Lessons From Petrofac And Waldorf – The Impact On English Restructuring Plans (Podcast)

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
Following the overturn of the Petrofac restructuring plan by the Court of Appeal in July 2025 and the High Court's subsequent refusal...
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Katrina Buckley’s articles from A&O Shearman are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Oil & Gas industries
A&O Shearman are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring, Consumer Protection and Insurance topic(s)

Following the overturn of the Petrofac restructuring plan by the Court of Appeal in July 2025 and the High Court's subsequent refusal to sanction the Waldorf restructuring plan in August 2025, London Restructuring partners Katrina Buckley, Karen McMaster and Tim Watson and Restructuring Senior Knowledge Lawyer Chris Poel have sat down with Lisa Rickelton (senior managing director from FTI Consulting, with over 20 years of experience of advising stakeholders on complex insolvency and restructuring matters) to discuss what effect these judgments may have on structuring complex restructurings and the process and practice of preparing a restructuring plan.

The Petrofac judgment marked a significant milestone in the continuing development of the English restructuring plan, being only the second occasion on which a sanctioned restructuring plan has been overturned by the Court of Appeal (following the Adler case in 2024). In turn, much the reasoning behind the reversal of Petrofac plan had a significant bearing on the High Court's ensuing rejection of the Waldorf plan. The issues considered by the Courts and the guidance handed down from the bench in both cases have come under considerable scrutiny from the market, and stakeholders will be keen to understand the implications if they are considering making use of the restructuring plan tool.

Our podcast contributors discuss the specific commercial matters at play in the Petrofac case and why the Court of Appeal came to its decision; the impact of Petrofac on the Waldorf case, what amounts to a "fair" allocation of the benefits generated by a restructuring; how companies can strengthen their evidence to justify such allocations; and the merits or otherwise of possible alternatives to a restructuring plan.

For further details, we also recommend reading our previous article setting out a thorough consideration of the Petrofac Court of Appeal judgment and its implications.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More