ARTICLE
10 February 2015

Court Affirms Disclosure In NPDES Permitting Is Critical To Permit Shield

TP
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Contributor

Troutman Pepper Locke helps clients solve complex legal challenges and achieve their business goals in an ever-changing global economy. With more than 1,600 attorneys in 30+ offices, the firm serves clients in all major industry sectors, with particular depth in energy, financial services, health care and life sciences, insurance and reinsurance, private equity, and real estate. Learn more at troutman.com.
A recent Sixth Circuit decision on permit shield protection reinforces the importance of full disclosure to the permitting agency
United States Environment

A recent Sixth Circuit decision on permit shield protection reinforces the importance of full disclosure to the permitting agency.  The Sixth Circuit found a coal company was shielded from Clean Water Act liability for discharges exceeding state water quality standards by a state NPDES general permit.   This is the latest decision in a series of cases where courts have wrestled with the scope of protection afforded by the CWA's permit shield provision.  See 33 U.S.C. § 1342(k).  The decision stands in stark contrast to a recent Fourth Circuit decision (Appalachian Mt. Stewards v. A&G Coal Corp., 758 F.3d 560 (4th Cir. 2014)), with the primary difference being what was disclosed to, and within the reasonable contemplation of, the state when it issued the permit.  The recent Sixth Circuit decision can be found here: Sierra Club v. ICG Hazard, LLC, Case No. 13-5086, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1283 (6th Cir. Jan. 27, 2015).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More