ARTICLE
10 February 2015

Court Affirms Disclosure In NPDES Permitting Is Critical To Permit Shield

A recent Sixth Circuit decision on permit shield protection reinforces the importance of full disclosure to the permitting agency
United States Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A recent Sixth Circuit decision on permit shield protection reinforces the importance of full disclosure to the permitting agency.  The Sixth Circuit found a coal company was shielded from Clean Water Act liability for discharges exceeding state water quality standards by a state NPDES general permit.   This is the latest decision in a series of cases where courts have wrestled with the scope of protection afforded by the CWA's permit shield provision.  See 33 U.S.C. § 1342(k).  The decision stands in stark contrast to a recent Fourth Circuit decision (Appalachian Mt. Stewards v. A&G Coal Corp., 758 F.3d 560 (4th Cir. 2014)), with the primary difference being what was disclosed to, and within the reasonable contemplation of, the state when it issued the permit.  The recent Sixth Circuit decision can be found here: Sierra Club v. ICG Hazard, LLC, Case No. 13-5086, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1283 (6th Cir. Jan. 27, 2015).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More