ARTICLE
30 October 2019

Public Employers: Janus One Year Later

FP
Fisher Phillips LLP

Contributor

Fisher Phillips LLP logo
Fisher Phillips LLP is a national law firm committed to providing practical business solutions for employers’ workplace legal problems. Labor and employment law is all the firm does, offering deep and broad knowledge and experience in the area of the law the attorneys know best. Fisher Phillips attorneys help clients avoid legal problems, are dedicated to providing exceptional client service, and are there when you need them. The firm has over 400 attorneys in 34 offices with 33 locations. Learn more at www.fisherphillips.com.
Until just last year, it was common for public sector collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) to require employees who elected not to belong to a union
United States Employment and HR

Until just last year, it was common for public sector collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) to require employees who elected not to belong to a union, but were still covered by the CBA, to pay “fair share” fees to the union as a condition of employment. However, the Supreme Court dramatically reversed course in last year’s Janus v. AFSCME decision and found the practice unconstitutional. While seemingly a straightforward decision, public employers, public employees and unions are still faced with challenges, frustrations, questions and uncertainties in handling the practical implications of the decision one year later. In a contributed article in Akron Legal News, William Blackie and Lauren Tompkins outline what public employers need to know a year after the Janus decision.

To read the full article, visit the Akron Legal News.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More