ARTICLE
1 July 2026

DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need To Know

MF
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.

Contributor

Since its founding in 1929, Masuda Funai has focused its practice on successfully representing international and domestic companies entering, operating and expanding in the United States. With offices in Chicago, Schaumburg and Los Angeles, the firm assists clients in every aspect of business, including establishing, acquiring, financing and selling operations and facilities; transferring overseas employees to the U.S.
The U.S. Department of Labor has proposed a new rule establishing when multiple businesses may be treated as joint employers under federal labor law, potentially holding companies responsible for wage...
United States Employment and HR
James Jansen’s articles from Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd. are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services, Property and Law Firm industries
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd. are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR, International Law and Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives and HR

On April 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking addressing when multiple businesses may be treated as joint employers under federal law. The proposal is intended to create a single, consistent standard under the Fair Labor Standards Act and apply that same framework to the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. This comes after several years of uncertainty following the rescission of the prior rule in 2021. For employers, this matters because the outcome of a joint employer analysis can determine whether you may be held responsible for another company’s wage, hour, or leave violations, particularly in common business arrangements involving staffing agencies, subcontractors, or other third parties.

The proposal focuses primarily on “vertical” joint employment, which is where one business employs a worker, but another business also benefits from that work. The DOL proposes a four-factor test to determine when that second business may also be treated as an employer, looking at whether it (1) hires or fires the worker, (2) supervises or controls the work, (3) determines pay, and (4) maintains employment records. The analysis is fact-specific and focuses on the practical reality of the relationship rather than contract language alone.

The rule also addresses “horizontal” joint employment, which applies when a worker has relationships with two employers in the same workweek. In that scenario, the question is whether the employers are sufficiently connected to each other, such as sharing employees, acting in each other’s interest, or exercising some level of shared control. If so, the employers may be treated as joint employers and may need to combine the worker’s hours for overtime purposes.

Remember, this is just a proposed rule, not final yet. The DOL is accepting public comments through June 22, 2026, and may revise the proposal before issuing a final version. If and when it is finalized, it will guide how the DOL enforces joint employer issues and will likely influence how courts analyze these relationships going forward.

Now is a good time for employers to review existing worker relationships, particularly those involving staffing agencies or subcontractors, and consider whether any adjustments may be needed to reduce potential joint employer liability before a final rule is issued.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More