ARTICLE
27 October 2025

Federal Court Enjoins Enforcement Of California's Ban On "Captive Audience" Meetings (SB 399)

KM
Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard

Contributor

Kronick is a full-service law firm serving clients throughout California. The firm plays an integral role in many significant matters shaping and defining the state’s legal landscape, and its attorneys take pride in providing exceptional legal representation to every client.

Serving both public and private clients, our attorneys offer strategic advice and guidance on a variety of matters, helping clients to minimize risks while navigating complex regulatory issues. We establish collaborative working relationships with clients and create effective educational tools.

Senate Bill (SB) 399, codified as California Labor Code § 1137, prohibits employers from taking adverse action against employees who refuse to attend employer-sponsored meetings relating to the employer's opinions on religious or political matters/
United States California Employment and HR
Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard are most popular:
  • within Energy and Natural Resources, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)

Senate Bill (SB) 399, codified as California Labor Code § 1137, prohibits employers from taking adverse action against employees who refuse to attend employer-sponsored meetings relating to the employer's opinions on religious or political matters, including meetings concerning or related to unionization. Kronick provides a detailed overview of this law in its 2025 Legislative Update.

Shortly before the law took effect on January 1, 2025, the California Chamber of Commerce, joined by other employer groups, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California challenging the constitutionality of SB 399. On September 30, 2025, the court granted a preliminary injunction, temporarily enjoining the enforcement of SB 399. The court held that SB 399 is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act insofar as it prohibits employers from requiring attendance at meetings concerning unionization. The court further concluded that the law constitutes an unconstitutional regulation of employer speech in violation of the First Amendment.

The state may appeal the injunction. In the interim, the court's decision affords temporary relief to California employers, renewing their ability to require employees to attend such meetings while the litigation continues on the merits. Kronick will continue to monitor these developments. For questions related to SB 399 or similar matters, please contact a Kronick attorney for further discussion.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More