ARTICLE
31 January 2025

Supreme Court Makes It A Little Easier To Win Argument On FLSA Classification

SR
Shulman Rogers

Contributor

Shulman Rogers is a full-service law firm with its principal office located in Potomac, Maryland and branch offices in Tysons Corner, Virginia, Alexandria, Virginia and Washington, D.C. Today, with 110+ attorneys, 30 legal assistants and more than 50 other staff and support personnel, the firm is organized into five general operating departments: real estate, business & financial services, litigation, medical malpractice/personal injury and trusts & estates.
The Supreme Court issued a decision last week that makes it easier for employers to prove an employee is exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
United States Maryland North Carolina South Carolina Virginia West Virginia Employment and HR

The Supreme Court issued a decision last week that makes it easier for employers to prove an employee is exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The Court held that the "preponderance of the evidence" standard of proof (effectively, more likely than not) applies instead of the more stringent "clear and convincing evidence" standard of proof when an employer seeks to demonstrate that an employee is exempt from the FLSA.

This is good news for employers because a consistent standard of proof will now be applied across the country. The decision is especially important for employers in the Fourth Circuit (Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia) because the Fourth Circuit was the only federal Court of Appeals that required application of the clear and convincing evidence standard of proof.

The decision does not change much for day-to-day HR decisions, and FLSA exemptions still should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. However, if an employer's decision is challenged in court, the employer is more likely to win as long as it can show justification for the exemption.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More