ARTICLE
22 January 2025

Supreme Court Simplifies Employer Obligations For FLSA Exemption Compliance

PC
Pender & Coward

Contributor

Pender & Coward is a full-service law firm committed to fostering long-term client partnerships by understanding their unique business and personal needs. The firm delivers tailored legal solutions through comprehensive expertise, responsiveness, and adaptability to evolving requirements.

Integrity drives their practice, emphasizing high-quality, cost-effective solutions while maintaining rigorous ethical standards. Work is assigned to the most qualified team members to ensure efficiency, transparency, and accountability.

With a client-centered and results-driven approach, Pender & Coward serves individuals, businesses, and corporate counsel. Their personalized, detail-oriented services focus on earning trust and delivering successful outcomes across a broad range of legal matters.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently clarified the standard of proof employers must meet to establish that workers are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") overtime requirements.
United States Virginia Employment and HR

Supreme Court Gives Employers a Win by Overturning the Fourth Circuit

The U.S. Supreme Court recently clarified the standard of proof employers must meet to establish that workers are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") overtime requirements. In doing so, it overturned a decision by Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Virginia, that required employers to meet a "clear and convincing" standard when justifying classification of an employee as exempt. Under this relatively high standard, employers had to show that the evidence made it highly probable or reasonably certain that the employee was exempt.

In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled that employers only need to prove exemptions by a "preponderance of the evidence." This standard aligns with the general evidentiary threshold in civil cases, requiring only that employers prove that it is more likely than not that the exemption applies.

What This Means for Employers

For business owners and HR professionals, this decision simplifies the process of defending employee classification decisions in wage and hour disputes. The Fourth Circuit placed a higher burden for employers to prove exemptions, such as those for executive, administrative, and professional employees.

With this ruling, Virginia employers, like employers in other states, face a uniform and less stringent evidentiary standard when justifying classifying employees as exempt. However, it is essential to note that while the burden has been reduced, the responsibility to correctly classify employees remains significant. Misclassification can result in costly lawsuits, back wages, and penalties.

While the uniform "preponderance of the evidence" standard is more employer-friendly, it is still important to ensure that any claimed exemptions meet the detailed FLSA requirements.Employers should continue to maintain proper records, including job descriptions and clear evidence of employee duties and salary levels. They should also periodically review their employee classifications to ensure compliance. Employers can minimize misclassification risks by performing regular FLSA audits, training their HR teams, and consulting legal experts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More