ARTICLE
24 June 2026

EBSA Leader Targets ESG And DEI In Enforcement Efforts

HB
Hall Benefits Law

Contributor

Strategically designed, legally compliant benefit plans are the cornerstone of long-term business stability and growth. As such, HBL provides comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in M&A, ESOPs, executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, retirement plans, and ERISA litigation matters. Responsive, relationship-driven counsel is the calling card of the Firm.
The Employee Benefits Security Administration's new leadership has announced a significant shift in enforcement priorities, targeting benefit plan managers who incorporate environmental, social, and governance factors or diversity...
United States Employment and HR
Hall Benefits Law’s articles from Hall Benefits Law are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Securities & Investment industries

Daniel Aronowitz, the top official for the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), a division of the U.S. Department of Labor, recently spoke at a national trade group’s conference about EBSA priorities. He unveiled EBSA’s new concentration on enforcing federal regulations and laws against benefit plan managers, including those focused on investment goals related to environmental or diversity concerns. 

According to Aronowitz, EBSA may target employee benefit plan managers who, in making investment decisions, pursue environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors or support diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as a breach of the duty of loyalty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Aronowitz lumped ESG and DEI investment decisions in with individuals and entities acting in “bad faith” and “misappropriating assets set aside for the benefit of the American worker,” branding those actions as “disloyal.” 

Aronowitz also criticized EBSA’s prior efforts, characterizing them as creating an “extra regulatory dragnet.” He also pointed out EBSA’s submission of various amicus briefs filed in support of employers’ position in some appellate cases, including ERISA claims involving Home Depot, Lockheed Martin, and Parker-Hannifin Corp. Nonetheless, he stated that EBSA was neither “pro business,” “pro plan sponsor,” nor “pro participant.” Instead, he emphasized that EBSA would work to “derail litigation abuse” and “restore ERISA’s neutrality.” 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More