ARTICLE
1 June 2026

Tennessee Changes Its Non-Compete Landscape

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
Tennessee is poised to enact significant new limitations on non-compete agreements. The Tennessee General Assembly passed House Bill 1034 (“HB 1034”), introducing two key changes to the law governing...
United States Tennessee Employment and HR
Shawn D. Fabian’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Oil & Gas industries
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

Tennessee is poised to enact significant new limitations on non-compete agreements. The Tennessee General Assembly passed House Bill 1034 (“HB 1034”), introducing two key changes to the law governing restrictive covenants: (i) it establishes statutory rebuttable presumptions for the reasonableness of time restrictions, and (ii) it prohibits non-compete agreements with employees earning less than $70,000 in annualized compensation. Governor Bill Lee signed HB 1034 on May 7, 2026, and the legislation is slated to take effect July 1, 2026. HB 1034 represents a meaningful shift in Tennessee’s approach to non-competes.

Rebuttable Presumptions on Time Restriction

HB 1034 establishes rebuttable presumptions for the reasonableness of time restrictions. For former employees and independent contractors, a restraint of two years or less is presumed reasonable. For distributors, dealers, franchisees, and similar business relationships, a restraint of three years or less is presumed reasonable. For covenants tied to the sale of a business or equity interest, the presumptively reasonable period is the longer of five years or the period during which payments are made to the seller.

Compensation Threshold for Non-Competes

HB 1034 prohibits non-compete agreements for employees earning less than $70,000 in annualized compensation, inclusive of wages, salary, commission, and non-discretionary bonus. Compensation for hourly employees is calculated by multiplying the hourly rate by 40 hours and then by 52 weeks.

Non-Solicits and Confidentiality/Non-Disclosure Provisions

HB 1034 expressly preserves employers’ ability to enforce non-solicits and confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements without adhering to the same non-compete mandates.

Practical Takeaways for Employers

Employers should review their existing restrictive covenant agreement templates and confirm that the temporal scope satisfies the requirements of the law. Employers should also ensure not to require Tennessee-based employees earning less than $70,000 in annualized compensation to sign non-competes.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More