ARTICLE
26 July 2016

FTC Consent Order With Two Ohio Auto Dealers Resolves Misleading Advertising Claims

TP
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Contributor

Troutman Pepper Locke helps clients solve complex legal challenges and achieve their business goals in an ever-changing global economy. With more than 1,600 attorneys in 30+ offices, the firm serves clients in all major industry sectors, with particular depth in energy, financial services, health care and life sciences, insurance and reinsurance, private equity, and real estate. Learn more at troutman.com.
The FTC barred the Progressive Dealers from misrepresenting the cost of vehicle purchases and leases, or "any other material fact about the price, sale, financing, or leasing of any vehicle."
United States Consumer Protection

On July 14, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it had entered into a final consent order with Ohio auto dealers Progressive Chevrolet Company and Progressive Motors Inc. (collectively, the "Progressive Dealers"), which the FTC had "charged with deceiving consumers by using advertising that touted low monthly car lease payments and down payments but failed to disclose other key terms of the offers."

The agreement, which is not accompanied by a financial penalty, prohibits the Progressive Dealers "from advertising the amount of any monthly payment, down payment, or other payment, unless they clearly and conspicuously disclose all qualifications or restrictions on a consumer's ability to obtain the advertised terms." Any advertisements by the Progressive Dealers limiting offers to certain credit scores must disclose if a majority of consumers are unlikely to meet that threshold.

The FTC barred the Progressive Dealers from misrepresenting the cost of vehicle purchases and leases, or "any other material fact about the price, sale, financing, or leasing of any vehicle."  Additional prohibitions include "advertising a payment amount, or that any or no initial payment is required at lease inception, without clearly disclosing other key terms."  The order remains in place for 20 years.

This deal is further indication of the considerable scrutiny that government agencies recently have been giving consumer vehicle purchases.  We previously reported in the past year on administrative settlements involving the FTC and dealer credit reporting; the Massachusetts Attorney General and excessive interest claims; and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Department of Justice and discriminatory loan practices.

The Troutman Sanders’ Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor blog offers timely updates regarding the financial services industry to inform you of recent changes in the law, upcoming regulatory deadlines and significant judicial opinions that may impact your business. To view the blog, click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More