ARTICLE
24 June 2026

CFPB Rescinds 2020 Special Purpose Credit Program Advisory Opinion

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has rescinded its 2020 advisory opinion on Special Purpose Credit Programs under Regulation B, citing outdated interpretations and constitutional concerns. This action follows April 2026 amendments that fundamentally altered the regulatory framework governing how for-profit organizations can establish credit programs designed to meet special social needs.
United States Consumer Protection
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On June 17, the CFPB rescinded its December 2020 advisory opinion addressing Special Purpose Credit Programs (SPCPs) under Regulation B and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). The 2020 guidance had sought to clarify certain requirements applicable to for-profit organizations establishing SPCPs designed to meet special social needs.

According to the Bureau, the 2020 advisory opinion had become outdated and contained statements that conflicted with the amended regulation. The CFPB also stated that rescinding the opinion would help avoid confusion regarding the applicable requirements for such programs and address constitutional concerns identified by the Bureau.

Specifically, the CFPB stated that the 2020 advisory opinion:

  • Contained superseded interpretations. Certain portions of the opinion addressed provisions of Regulation B that were subsequently amended in April 2026 and no longer reflected the current regulatory framework.
  • Included guidance inconsistent with the revised rule. The Bureau noted that the opinion contemplated the use of characteristics such as race, national origin, and sex as eligibility factors in certain circumstances, while the April 2026 rule prohibits for-profit SPCPs from using race, color, national origin, or sex as eligibility criteria.
  • Applied a different standard for determining need. The rescinded opinion discussed circumstances in which a class of persons probably would not receive credit under a creditor's customary standards, whereas the amended rule requires creditors to document that the affected class actually would be denied credit absent the SPCP.
  • Raised constitutional concerns. The Bureau stated that the prior guidance could be viewed as encouraging programs that distinguish among applicants based on protected characteristics and therefore could present constitutional issues.

The Bureau emphasized that the rescission itself does not have the force and effect of law and does not create any new substantive requirements.

Putting It Into Practice: The recission follows the CFPB’sApril 2026 amendments to Regulation B, which revised the standards governing SPCPs offered or participated in by for-profit organizations (previously discussed here). Companies relying on prior CFPB guidance should continue to monitor the Bureau's ongoing efforts to withdraw or revise existing interpretations and update compliance practices as necessary.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More