- within Environment topic(s)
Michael Selig was confirmed by the US Senate on Thursday,
December 18, 2025, and he will soon be sworn in as the 16th
Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Selig
will assume leadership of the CFTC, which has been under the
direction of Acting Chairman Caroline Pham for almost a year, the
last few months of which Pham has been the sole Senate-confirmed
official.
Selig is not new to the CFTC. He began his career in 2014 as a law
clerk for then-CFTC Commissioner (and future Chairman) J.
Christopher Giancarlo. Following his time with the CFTC, Selig
moved into private practice, working at several global law firms.
Selig's practice focused on advising financial institutions,
trading platforms and digital asset developers on compliance with
securities and commodities laws. Selig returned to government in
2025 when he was appointed chief counsel for the Crypto Task Force
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), serving as senior
advisor to SEC Chairman Paul Atkins.
With Selig at the helm, the CFTC will face many important decisions
related to enforcement, crypto regulation and agency resources.
During his confirmation hearing, Selig emphasized his commitment
"to instituting common-sense principles and principles-based
regulations that facilitate well-functioning markets and keep pace
with the rapid speed of innovation."1 Selig also
highlighted his desire to scale back regulation, noting,
"I'm in favor of the minimum effective dose of regulation,
no more, no less."2 Given the important issues at
hand, we believe Selig's philosophy will have a fundamental
impact on the future and direction of the CFTC.
In this alert, we highlight six important issues to watch as Selig
is sworn in to his new role as the Chairman of the CFTC.
1. The Evolving Role of CFTC Enforcement
At his confirmation hearing, Selig noted that he has "seen
firsthand how regulators unaware of the real-world impact of their
actions and zeal for regulation by enforcement can drive businesses
offshore and smother entrepreneurs in red tape." He
specifically cited his experience "helping an agriculture firm
that was forced to divert significant time and resources from its
business to defend itself in an extensive investigation for
harmless errors in its swap data reporting."3
We expect Selig's tenure at the CFTC to be broadly aligned with
Pham's philosophy of avoiding so-called regulation by
enforcement and deprioritizing matters based on alleged failures to
comply with technical regulations—such as recordkeeping and
reporting—that do not otherwise result in customer loss or
degradation of market integrity.
Selig will inherit a CFTC Division of Enforcement (DOE) that has
undergone a significant shift in the past year. Under Pham, the DOE
enforcement agenda has focused on a return to the basics. Pham
reoriented the DOE away from "operational or technical
non-compliance issues with no harm" and reallocated resources
to focus on "DOE's mission to protect against fraud,
manipulation and abuse in our markets."4 Pham also
directed CFTC staff to follow the Department of Justice's
policy on digital asset enforcement and deprioritize matters
involving violations of registration
requirements.5
On February 4, 2025, Pham announced a reorganization of the
DOE's task forces to combat fraud and help victims.6
The previous DOE task forces were condensed into two new task
forces: the Complex Fraud Task Force and the Retail Fraud and
General Enforcement Task Force. A few weeks later, Pham announced a
30-day enforcement sprint to encourage market participants to
expeditiously resolve open enforcement matters involving compliance
issues.7 As part of the push to focus enforcement on
matters of fraud, market abuse and consumer harm, Pham also revised
the DOE's self-reporting policies to allow disclosures to the
CFTC's operating divisions (instead of DOE). She also
introduced a three-tier scale for self-reporting and a four-tier
scale for cooperation, both of which provide presumptive mitigation
credit discounts.8 On September 4, 2025, as a result of
the sprint, the CFTC issued six orders that concurrently filed and
settled compliance-related enforcement matters against 10 firms,
resulting in $8,325,000 in penalties.9
Earlier this month, the CFTC announced amendments to its Rules of
Practice and its Rules Relating to Investigations, the goal of
which is increasing the transparency of enforcement proceedings.
Consistent with some of Pham's prior concerns about the
enforcement process, the amendments include measures to improve
internal action memoranda, improve notifications under the Wells
process and extend the timeline for providing Wells submissions to
30 days.10
We expect Selig to be generally aligned with Pham's focus on
fraud, market abuse and consumer harm as opposed to sweeps and
technical violations. However, we do not anticipate that the Selig
Chairmanship will be without enforcement activity. Despite his
criticism of regulation by enforcement, Selig referred to the CFTC
in the future acting as "a cop on the beat, a strong cop on
the beat under my leadership and I intend to always adhere to the
law, make sure we're enforcing the law."11 At
his confirmation hearing, Selig also emphasized that enforcement
should "be vigilant in our surveillance efforts and our
examination efforts of market participants and make sure that
we're policing fraud and manipulation in these
markets."12
2. The Future of Digital Assets Regulation
Regulatory Harmonization and Coordination
With Selig joining the CFTC from his most recent role at the
SEC—where he worked closely with Paul Atkins and other SEC
senior leadership—we expect him to promote close
collaboration with the SEC, prudential banking regulators, the
Treasury and the White House. The CFTC and the SEC have recently
prioritized regulatory harmonization and interagency collaboration,
including by launching a cross-agency crypto initiative to
coordinate efforts regarding the process for facilitating the
trading of certain spot crypto asset products.13 In
addition, in a joint statement, Atkins and Pham stated that the SEC
and the CFTC "are committed to using [their] existing
authorities to establish fit-for-purpose regulations for innovative
products and trading platforms."14
We anticipate that the CFTC will continue to prioritize regulatory
harmonization with the SEC under Selig's leadership. Selig
previously participated in the President's working group on
digital asset markets.15 Consistent with recommendations
in the working group report, specific areas where the CFTC and SEC
might seek to collaborate include establishing crypto-related safe
harbors, providing flexibility to registrants seeking to offer
multiple services within a single user interface, and coordinating
future crypto rulemaking efforts.16
Building on the CFTC's Ongoing Digital Asset Initiatives
Under Pham's leadership, the CFTC launched a 12-month
"Crypto Sprint" in August 2025, with a focus on three
main components: (i) listed spot crypto trading on CFTC-registered
designated contract markets (DCMs), which the CFTC announced had
commenced on one DCM in early December 2025,17 (ii)
facilitating the use of tokenized collateral, including
stablecoins, and (iii) rulemakings amending the CFTC's
regulations to enable the use of blockchain technology and market
infrastructure in derivatives markets.18 As part of this
sprint, the CFTC has launched initiatives and sought public comment
regarding the use of tokenized collateral and listed spot crypto
trading.19 And in November 2025, Pham stated that the
CFTC expects to commence rulemaking in 2026 to amend its
regulations to accommodate blockchain technology, with the goal of
finalizing the process by August of next year.20
Additionally, the CFTC recently announced the launch of a digital
assets pilot program for tokenized collateral in derivatives
markets.21
When nominated, Selig "pledge[d] to work tirelessly" to
"help the President make the United States the Crypto Capital
of the World."22 Given Selig's statements
during his confirmation process and his previous work on crypto
issues—both with the SEC's Crypto Task Force and in
private practice—we generally expect that he will further the
CFTC's focus on developing a regulatory framework that embraces
crypto and promotes innovation. Although Selig has not explicitly
discussed any of the CFTC's ongoing crypto initiatives, during
his confirmation hearing he noted that the CFTC currently possesses
the authority to regulate certain aspects of crypto asset markets.
Pursuant to this authority, we anticipate that the CFTC will adopt
a forward-looking approach that allows CFTC registrants to engage
in crypto-related activities.
Crypto Market Structure Legislation
Congress is currently considering crypto market structure
legislation that would grant the CFTC substantial authority over
crypto asset spot markets.23 For example, the CLARITY
Act, which passed the House of Representatives in July 2025, would
provide the CFTC with primary regulatory oversight over spot
digital commodities as well as other authority over digital
commodity markets and digital commodity market
participants.24 And while the Senate is still developing
its version of crypto market structure legislation, discussion
drafts of the Senate legislation would grant the CFTC similar
regulatory authority.25 During his confirmation hearing,
Selig expressed support for crypto market structure legislation,
noting that it is a key first step in providing clarity and
enhancing consumer protection in these markets.
We anticipate that under Selig's leadership, the CFTC will
quickly move to implement any digital assets market structure
legislation and keep pace with ongoing developments in these
markets. Throughout the implementation process, we would also
expect the CFTC to continue to seek industry input as it tailors
its regulations under Selig's leadership.
3. Reducing Regulatory Burdens for CFTC Registrants
At his confirmation hearing, Selig emphasized his commitment to
principles-based regulations and expressed concerns about the
"unwritten law" developed through interpretive guidance
and no-action letters, saying that it is "vitally important
that we modernize and that we get rid of the law, the staff law,
the no-action letters, all this kind of unwritten rules of the road
where it's really hard for everyday Americans to
comply."26 In several exchanges during his
confirmation hearing, Selig expressed concerns about unnecessary
regulatory burdens, noting that some rules could be implemented in
a less burdensome manner.
This regulatory philosophy is not unlike Pham's approach, who
declared on her first day as Acting Chairman that the CFTC would
"get back to basics." It is also consistent with how
previous CFTC Chairmen have addressed regulation, including
Giancarlo's Project KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) initiative,
which was intended to be "an agency-wide review of CFTC rules,
regulations and practices to make them simpler, less burdensome and
less costly."27
Given the work done by the CFTC during the previous Trump
Administration, and some of the initiatives started by Pham that
were described as intended to address "longstanding issues
created by overreach in the CFTC's implementation of the
Dodd-Frank Act,"28 we expect several high-profile
CFTC regulatory regimes to be reconsidered. This could include not
just the swap dealer de minimis registration framework,
but also swap dealer business conduct standard rules such as the
pre-trade mid-market mark requirement, which was recently withdrawn
through staff action.
Selig could also work to harmonize and recalibrate regulations
applying to dually registered SEC and CFTC entities, such as swap
dealers and security-based swap dealers, broker-dealers/future
commission merchants (FCMs), and commodity pool operators and
commodity trading advisers that are also registered with and
regulated by the SEC.
4. The Future of Event Contracts
Selig steps into leadership at the CFTC at a critical crossroads
for the future of event contracts. Event contracts, which allow
participants to enter into contracts to predict the outcome of
real-world events, have sparked heated debate after a landmark
ruling in September 2024 in which a federal district court declared
that congressional control contracts traded on CFTC-regulated
platforms are legitimate futures products rather than
gaming.29
In the wake of this decision, CFTC-regulated platforms have begun
offering a wider variety of event contracts, including those
related to sports-based events. Although these contracts resemble
traditional sports betting, they are facilitated by CFTC-registered
entities such as FCMs and DCMs, blurring the line between financial
products and gaming and putting long-standing state-federal
regulatory boundaries to the test. More recently, traditional
sports betting companies have entered the market, filing
applications for registration with the CFTC or announcing
partnerships with CFTC-regulated platforms to offer sports-based
event contracts.
State gaming authorities have raised concerns about sports-based
event contracts and issued cease-and-desist orders due to potential
conflicts with state gaming laws. Currently, federal courts remain
divided. District courts in Nevada and New Jersey granted temporary
restraining orders against state regulators, determining that CFTC
jurisdiction preempts state enforcement over event-based contracts
on CFTC-regulated platforms.30 A district court in
Maryland reached the opposite conclusion, ruling that the Commodity
Exchange Act, and the amendments to the law under the 2010
Dodd-Frank Act that enable the CFTC to prohibit event contracts
"contrary to the public interest," do not preempt
long-standing state gaming laws.31 Federal courts in
Connecticut, New York, and Ohio have yet to issue rulings on
similar actions.32
Most recently, a Nevada federal judge reversed his two prior
preliminary injunctions, finding that the contracts offered were
"sports wagers" rather than CFTC-regulated financial
instruments. In the opinions, the judge stated that sports-based
event contracts are not "swaps" within the CFTC's
exclusive jurisdiction because they are based on the outcomes of
sporting events and do not involve events or contingencies
"inherently joined or connected" with potential financial
consequences.33 These cases are currently pending appeal
and could ultimately require resolution by the US Supreme
Court.
At the same time, there are several putative class actions against
CFTC-regulated platforms offering sports-based event
contracts.34 The class-actions allege that sports-based
event contracts offered on CFTC-regulated platforms violate state
and federal gaming laws and they seek declaratory and injunctive
relief, including money damages and disgorgement.35 The
class actions are still at the earliest stages and are not likely
to be resolved quickly.
The CFTC has yet to clarify its stance on sports-based event
contracts. During his confirmation hearing, Selig made clear that
he intends to defer to judicial decisions regarding the legality of
sports-based event contracts, rather than taking a proactive
regulatory stance. He emphasized respect for ongoing court
proceedings and suggested that Congress may ultimately need to
clarify statutory ambiguities.
Selig's "light touch" approach signals continuity
with recent CFTC leadership, prioritizing adherence to legal
precedent and judicial interpretation over immediate CFTC action.
This stance has drawn criticism from some policymakers and industry
groups, who argue that regulatory uncertainty leaves market
participants and consumers exposed while litigation plays out.
Several senators asked Selig to meet with interested parties and
constituencies outside the CFTC's traditional remit, suggesting
that this approach will remain an area of debate and focus both at
the CFTC and on Capitol Hill in 2026.
5. Need for Additional CFTC Resources, Commissioner Vacancies
During Selig's confirmation hearing, senators raised concerns regarding CFTC resources and staffing.36 Selig also received several questions related to the vacant Commissioner seats at the CFTC.37
Staffing and Resources
Since the beginning of the second Trump Administration, the CFTC
has seen a reduction of approximately 20% of its workforce and
currently employs around 600 staff members.38 With the
House passing the CLARITY Act and the Senate considering its own
crypto market structure legislation, the CFTC faces significantly
greater jurisdictional authority despite reduced staffing compared
with previous administrations.
During his confirmation hearing, Selig declined to make a
definitive statement about the need for additional staff or
resources, emphasizing that, if confirmed, he would first analyze
and evaluate the agency's current resource needs.39
Following this assessment, he said he would commit to work with the
Senate to secure the necessary funding to "fulfill our
critical mission."40
When senators pressed Selig on the issue of whether he supported
any amount of additional funding, he reaffirmed that he could not
decide whether the agency needed additional funding before he was
appointed.41
The bipartisan Senate Agriculture Committee's digital assets
legislative proposal includes provisions to give the CFTC
additional resources, specifically authorizing $150 million to
implement a crypto regulatory framework.42 While Selig
refrained from commenting on this provision, Senate Agriculture
Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-AR) pledged to collaborate with
senators to ensure adequate funding.43
Commission Composition
During Selig's confirmation hearing, senators also expressed
concerns about the lack of commissioners at the CFTC. If confirmed,
upon Pham's departure, Selig would be the sole commissioner,
granting the Trump administration considerable influence over the
agency's priorities. Traditionally, the CFTC is comprised of
five members: two Democrats, two Republicans, and a Chairman
aligned with the current administration.
Several senators, primarily Democrats, questioned how bipartisan
consensus on digital assets market structure legislation could be
possible without Democratic Commissioners to provide technical
guidance or participate in CFTC rulemaking.44 Selig
declined to comment on whether the vacant seats set a problematic
precedent, deferring to the President on nomination
decisions.45 He did, however, affirm his commitment to
valuing diverse viewpoints and working collaboratively with any
future appointees.46
We expect these two issues will remain present as Congress works on
potential digital assets market structure legislation, particularly
as the Senate seeks to develop a bipartisan proposal that will
satisfy lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. One path to
compromise might involve addressing the CFTC's resources to
provide greater funding to the agency and filling vacant
Commissioner seats.
6. Expedited Application Review Process for New CFTC Registrants
During the Biden Administration, registration application
reviews for DCMs, derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs), FCMs
and other CFTC registrant categories often took years to result in
CFTC approval or an amendment to an existing registration
order.
In the past year, however, the pace of registration reviews appears
to have substantially increased. Several DCMs received designations
(approvals) within months of submitting their applications this
year.47 Contributing to this shift are certain changes
made by the CFTC under Pham's leadership, including the
expansion of the CFTC's FCM registration FAQs in July
202548 and its launch in August 2025 of the "Crypto
Sprint," which rescinded staff guidance and established pilot
programs aimed at accelerating review times.49 When Pham
first assumed leadership at the CFTC in January 2025, her tenure
was marked by a notable wave of approvals for long-pending DCM and
DCO applications. Prior to Pham's leadership of the agency,
only three DCMs had received approval since 2022.50 In
2025 alone, five DCMs have received approval, as well as two
DCOs.51 We expect this trend to continue; recently, Pham
noted that new DCOs supporting tokenized collateral, including
stablecoins, will be "going live by Q1 or Q2 of next
year."52
As Selig steps into the role of CFTC Chairman, market participants
and aspiring registrants can reasonably expect continued momentum
for expedited review of pending applications. In his November 2025
Senate testimony, Selig stated that streamlining the application
process was a "key priority."53 He has pledged
to implement clear guidance and rapid, transparent rulemaking to
prevent further regulatory slowdowns, stating he plans to
"remove a lot of these barriers that are really in [the] way
[of] success" for applications.54 Selig's goal
of streamlining the process, combined with the already successful
reforms from earlier this year, indicates that the approval
environment for DCMs, DCOs and FCMs is likely to accelerate even
further in the coming year.
Footnotes
1. Hearings to Examine the Nomination of Michael Selig,
of Florida, to Be a Commissioner of the Commodity Futures Trading:
Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Agric., Nutrition, & Forestry,
119th Cong. (Nov. 19, 2025),
https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/senate-event/337642
("Selig Senate Nomination Hearing").
2. Id.
3. Id.
4. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Acting Chairman Pham
Announces Successful Completion of Enforcement Sprint, Press
Release No. 9114-25 (Sept. 4, 2025),
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9114-25.
5. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Acting Chairman Pham Lauds
DOJ Policy Ending Regulation by Prosecution of Digital Assets
Industry and Directs CFTC Staff to Comply with Executive Orders,
Press Release No. 9063-25 (Apr. 8, 2025),
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9063-25.
6. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, CFTC Division of
Enforcement to Refocus on Fraud and Helping Victims, Stop
Regulation by Enforcement, Press Release No. 9044-25 (Feb. 4,
2025), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9044-25.
7. Caroline D. Pham, Acting Chairman, Keynote Address at FIA
BOCA50, CFTC (Mar. 11, 2025),
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opapham13.
8. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, CFTC Releases Enforcement
Advisory on Self-Reporting, Cooperation, and Remediation, Press
Release No. 9054-25 (Feb. 25, 2025),
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9054-25.
9. CFTC Press Release No. 9114-25, supra note 5.
10. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Acting Chairman Pham
Announces Reforms to Wells Process, Amends Rules of Practice and
Rules Relating to Investigations, CFTC Release No. 9144-25 (Dec. 1,
2025), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9144-25.
11. Selig Senate Nomination Hearing, supra note 2.
12. Id.
13. See Staff of SEC and CFTC, SEC-CFTC Joint Staff Statement
(Project Crypto-Crypto Sprint) (Sept. 2, 2025), available at:
https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/sec-cftc-project-crypto-090225.
14. See SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins, CFTC Acting Chairman Caroline
D. Pham, Joint Statement from the Chairman of the SEC and Acting
Chairman of the CFTC (Sept. 5, 2025), available at:
https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/joint-statement-atkins-pham-090525.
15. See Michael S. Selig, Opening Statement of Michael S. Selig
Nominee to Serve as Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading
Commission- U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and
Forestry (Nov. 19, 2025), available at:
https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/52c5cea6-9d90-5a72-c9c7-9bdd6e46fd11/Testimony_Selig_11.19.2025.pdf.
16. See The Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets,
Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology
(July 30, 2025), available at:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Digital-Assets-Report-EO14178.pdf.
17. See CFTC Press Release No. 9145-25, Acting Chairman Pham
Announces First-Ever Listed Spot Crypto Trading on U.S. Regulated
Exchanges (Dec. 4, 2025), available at:
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9145-25.
18. See CFTC Press Release No. 9104-25, Acting Chairman Pham
Announces CFTC Crypto Sprint (Aug. 1, 2025), available at:
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9104-25; see also
Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham, Keynote Address by Acting
Chairman Caroline D. Pham, FIA EXPO (Nov. 18, 2025), available at:
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opapham19.
19. CFTC Press Release No. 9130-25, Acting Chairman Pham Launches
Tokenized Collateral and Stablecoins Initiative (Sept. 23, 2025),
available at: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9130-25;
CFTC Press Release No. 9105-25, Acting Chairman Pham Launches
Listed Spot Crypto Trading Initiative (Aug. 4, 2025), available at:
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9105-25.
20. Keynote Address by Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham, FIA EXPO,
supra note 18.
21. See CFTC Press Release No. 9146-25, Acting Chairman Pham
Announces Launch of Digital Assets Pilot Program for Tokenized
Collateral in Derivatives Markets (Dec. 8, 2025), available at:
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9146-25.
22. See Mike Selig (@MikeSeligEsq), Post on X (Oct. 25, 2025),
available at:
https://x.com/MikeSeligEsq/status/1982130194400854387.
23. See Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, H.R. 3633, 119th
Cong. (2025).
24. See id.
25. See S. Comm. on Agric., Nutrition, and Forestry, Boozman,
Booker Release Bipartisan Market Structure Discussion Draft (Nov.
10, 2025), available at:
https://www.agriculture.senate.gov/newsroom/rep/press/release/boozman-booker-release-bipartisan-market-structure-discussion-draft
("Discussion Draft Press Release").
26. Id.
27. Christopher Giancarlo, Remarks of Acting Chairman Before the
42nd Annual International Futures Industry Conference, Boca Raton,
Fla. (Mar. 15, 2017),
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opagiancarlo-20.
28. Keynote Address by Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham, FIA EXPO,
supra note 18.
29. See KalshiEX, LLC v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, No.
CV 23-3257 (JMC), 2024 WL 4164694 (D.D.C. Sept. 12, 2024)
(reasoning that the term "gaming" did not apply to
election contracts and that the contracts did not involve illegal
activity under federal or state law).
30. See KalshiEX, LLC v. Hendrick, 2025 WL 1073495, at *1 (D. Nev.
Apr. 9, 2025) (enjoining the Nevada Gaming Commission from pursuing
civil or criminal enforcement against Kalshi for offering event
contracts in Nevada); see also N. Am. Derivatives Exch., Inc. v.
Hendrick, No. 2:25-cv-00978 (D. Nev. June 3, 2025); KalshiEX, LLC v
Flaherty, 2025 WL 1218313, at *6 (holding state law is preempted by
the CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction); KalshiEX, LLC v. Flaherty,
No. 25-cv-02152 (D. N.J. Apr. 28, 2025) (same).
31. See KalshiEX, LLC v. Martin, No. 1:25-cv-01283 (D. Md. Aug. 1,
2025).
32. See Complaint, KalshiEX, LLC v. Cafferelli, No. 3:25-02016 (D.
Conn. Dec. 3, 2025); Complaint, KalshiEX, LLC v. Williams, No.
1:25-cv-08846 (S.D.N.Y. Oct 26, 2025); Complaint, KalshiEX, LLC v.
Schuler, No. 2:25-cv-01165 (S.D. Ohio Oct 07, 2025).
33. N. Am. Derivatives Exch., Inc. v. Nevada Gaming Control Board,
No. 2:25-cv-00978-APG-BNW, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202104 (D. Nev.
Oct. 14, 2025); KalshiEX, LLC v. Hendrick, No.
2:25-cv-00575-APG-BNW, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234246 (D. Nev. Nov.
24, 2025).
34. See, e.g., Complaint, Georgia Gambling Recovery LLC v. Kalshi
Inc., et al., No. 4:25-cv-00311 (M.D. Ga. Oct 2, 2025); Complaint,
South Carolina Gambling Recovery LLC v. Kalshi Inc., et al.,
2025CP3700563 (South Carolina Court of Common Pleas, County of
Oconee, 10th Judicial Circuit, June 11, 2025); Complaint, Illinois
Gambling Recovery LLC v. Kalshi Inc., et al., No. 1:25-cv-11374
(N.D. Ill. Sep. 19, 2025).
35. See, e.g., id.
36. Selig Senate Nomination Hearing, supra note 2.
37. Id.
38. Id.
39. Id.
40. Id.
41. Id.
42. Discussion Draft Press Release, supra note 24.
43. Selig Senate Nomination Hearing, supra note 2.
44. Id.
45. Id.
46. Id.
47. CFTC, Designated Contract Markets, Industry Filings:
Designated Contract Markets (DCM) | CFTC.
48. CFTC, Release Number 9091-25, CFTC Staff Issues FCM FAQs |
CFTC.
49. Keynote Address by Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham, FIA EXPO,
supra note 18.
50. CFTC, Designated Contract Markets, Industry Filings: Designated
Contract Markets (DCM) | CFTC.
51. CFTC, Derivative Clearing Organizations,
https://www.cftc.gov/IndustryOversight/IndustryFilings/ClearingOrganizations.
52. Keynote Address by Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham, FIA EXPO,
supra note 18.
53. Selig Senate Nomination Hearing, supra note 2.
54. Id.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.