ARTICLE
22 September 2025

FTC And States Sue Live Nation/Ticketmaster Over Deceptive Ticketing Practices

FK
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz

Contributor

Frankfurt Kurnit provides high quality legal services to clients in many industries and disciplines worldwide. With leading practices in entertainment, advertising, IP, technology, litigation, corporate, estate planning, charitable organizations, professional responsibility and other areas — Frankfurt Kurnit helps clients face challenging legal issues and meet their goals with efficient solutions.
On September 17, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission, joined by seven state attorneys general, sued Live Nation Entertainment and its subsidiary Ticketmaster.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On September 17, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission, joined by seven state attorneys general, sued Live Nation Entertainment and its subsidiary Ticketmaster. Announcing the case, FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said: "American live entertainment is the best in the world and should be accessible to all of us. It should not cost an arm and a leg to take the family to a baseball game or attend your favorite musician's show."

The complaint alleges that the companies deceived consumers and artists by allowing professional ticket brokers to evade purchase limits, resell tickets at inflated prices on Ticketmaster's own platform, and conceal mandatory fees until late in the checkout process. The FTC claims these practices violated the FTC Act, the Better Online Ticket Sales ("BOTS") Act, and multiple state consumer protection laws.

Why it Matters
This case is part of a broader enforcement trend against hidden fees, misleading price disclosures, and business practices that regulators say create an uneven playing field for consumers. The participation of multiple states signals heightened coordination among enforcement agencies and an increased likelihood of follow-on investigations and class actions. Beyond legal exposure, companies risk significant consumer and media backlash if they are perceived as charging "junk fees" or failing to deliver on marketing promises.

Takeaways for Businesses

  • Transparent pricing is critical. If you advertise a starting price, regulators expect it to include all mandatory fees.
  • Enforce your policies. Posting limits or restrictions is not enough; companies must implement reasonable safeguards and document enforcement.
  • Review marketing and promotional claims. Promises such as "limited availability" or "lowest price" should be accurate and supported by systems that make those claims true in practice.
  • Prepare for multi-jurisdictional scrutiny. Federal agencies and state attorneys general are increasingly coordinating enforcement, opening the door to immediate monetary remedies in federal court.

Companies in many sectors—whether ticketing, subscriptions, consumer goods, or digital services—should see this as a reminder: legal risk is rising, and so is the expectation that marketing, pricing, and consumer treatment be transparent, fair, and defensible.

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More