ARTICLE
28 May 2025

IFRS vs ASC Valuation Perspective

Nexdigm USA

Contributor

Nexdigm provides integrated, digitally driven solutions encompassing Business and Professional Services that help companies navigate challenges across all stages of their life-cycle. Through our direct operations in the USA, Poland, UAE, and India, we serve a diverse range of clients, spanning multinationals, listed companies, privately-owned companies, and family-owned businesses from over 50 countries. Nexdigm is an employee-owned, privately held, independent global organization that helps companies across geographies meet the needs of a dynamic business environment. Our focus on problem-solving, supported by our multifunctional expertise enables us to provide customized solutions for our clients.
This article aims to highlight the key valuation triggers that stem from the application of various IFRS and outline the valuation-specific differences between IFRS and the Accounting Standards Codification.
United States Accounting and Audit

This article aims to highlight the key valuation triggers that stem from the application of various International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and outline the valuation-specific differences between IFRS and the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). The comprehensive analysis presented here would give readers a broad understanding of the valuation practices under IFRS as well as the nuances that differentiate valuations under IFRS from that of ASC.

IFRS – 1 (First-Time Adoption)

This standard sets out the procedures that an entity must follow when it adopts International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for the first time as the basis for preparing its general-purpose financial statements.

Valuation Trigger

A first-time adopter may elect to measure individual items at their fair value as on the date of transition to IFRS.

Measurement at Fair Value

Assets carried at cost may be measured at their fair value as on the date of transition.

Exceptions:

  • The entity must revalue assets under previous GAAP either to their fair value or to a price-index-adjusted cost.
  • The entity must make a one-time revaluation of assets or liabilities to fair value due to privatization or an initial public offering.

Differences between IFRS & ASC

ASC does not have a dedicated standard for first-time adoption. Instead, guidance for first time adoption is available within the respective standards.

IFRS – 2 (Share-Based Payments)

Share-based payments is a transaction in which an entity receives goods or services in exchange for consideration in the form of:

1630094a.jpg

Valuation Trigger

1. Transactions with employees and others providing similar services: Fair value as on grant date.

1630094b.jpg

2. Receipt of goods or services in exchange for equity instruments: Fair value as on the date of receipt of goods/services.

#1630094c.jpg

Measurement at Fair Value

The fair value of instruments should be determined using an appropriate option-pricing models such as:

1630094d.jpg

For complex financial instruments, advanced models such as the Binomial or Monte Carlo models are to be used.

Differences between IFRS & ASC

1630094e.jpg

To read this article in full, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More