ARTICLE
14 April 2025

Europe: UK's FCA Axes Proposed "Name And Shame" And D&I Requirements, And Delays Non-financial Misconduct Rules

KG
K&L Gates LLP

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority had proposed a so-called "name and shame" approach that would have allowed it, subject to certain safeguards, to disclose its investigations into firms publicly at an early stage...
United Kingdom Finance and Banking

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority had proposed a so-called "name and shame" approach that would have allowed it, subject to certain safeguards, to disclose its investigations into firms publicly at an early stage (see our earlier blog); however, following significant criticism from the financial industry and Parliament—largely highlighting risks that early disclosure could potentially cause irreversible damage to firms, including those later cleared of any wrongdoing—the FCA has abandoned the proposal.

It has, however, retained its existing ability to make a public announcement that it is or is not investigating a matter in "exceptional circumstances". Existing guidance suggests that the FCA might, for example, do this where it needs to confirm that it is investigating something where there is public concern or speculation. It might also, exceptionally, publish details of an investigation's findings if the fact of the investigation has become public and the FCA has found that the investigation was unwarranted.

The FCA had also sought to require financial services firms to collect and report diversity data, and set diversity and inclusion (D&I) targets, with a view to encouraging more inclusive workplaces. However, industry detractors argued that the FCA's proposed mandatory D&I rules could become an onerous "tick-box" exercise. Instead, the FCA has reverted to its original position of encouraging financial institutions to adopt their own voluntary approaches to improving diversity.

Despite recent high-profile cases, and a Treasury Select Committee report titled "Sexism in the City" which found a "shocking" prevalence of sexual harassment and bullying in the financial services industry, the FCA has delayed until June 2025 the finalisation of new rules on non-financial misconduct that are expected to expand the extent to which non-financial misconduct may be relevant to compliance with FCA rules.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More