It was fascinating talking with Alex de Vries, the founder of the cryptocurrency energy index Digiconomist, recently to talk about the sustainability of cryptocurrencies and digital assets.
Some key takeaways:
1. Empirical evidence shows the extremely high energy demands in proof of work networks, such as Bitcoin
2. Ethereum's merge to proof of stake is significant because it shows that change to more sustainable options is possible if there is a willing community
3. Decentralised systems will always be more energy consumptive than centralised systems but the trade-offs need to be weighed up.
It is also a fast evolving space and we are likely to see more research into calculating the energy consumption of proof of stake networks as well as reactions from regulators and policy makers.
The Bitcoin network itself is responsible for more carbon
emissions than we are reducing by deploying electric vehicles
around the world. The network would be responsible for around 70
million metric tons of carbon dioxide every year, whereas we are
only saving or reducing our carbon emissions by 50 million metric
tons every year from deploying electric vehicles.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
