ARTICLE
26 June 2024

HR Briefing - June 2024

M
Macfarlanes

Contributor

We are a distinctive law firm, combining expertise, agility, and a client-centric culture to address the most challenging legal demands and foster innovation. Our firm is structured around the needs of our clients, with whom we build long-lasting relationships, tackling complex issues in key practice areas.

Our approach is focused and deliberate. We assist clients with major transactions, including M&A, real estate, and financial products; handle significant litigation and investigations; and provide comprehensive private capital advice, particularly through our leading private client practice.

With offices in London and Brussels, and a strong international network, we collaborate with top lawyers globally to deliver the highest level of service. Our firm’s human-sized culture emphasizes long-term careers, fostering a cohesive, entrepreneurial environment where every team member can thrive.

Welcome to this month's briefing for HR teams and in-house employment counsel – bringing you this month's employment law highlights in an easy-to-read package.
United Kingdom Employment and HR

Welcome to this month's briefing for HR teams and in-house employment counsel – bringing you this month's employment law highlights in an easy-to-read package.

Podcast: misconduct and financial services

In a special podcast, as part of the firm's series ahead of the election, David Gauke, Kirti Tiwari-Mehta and Matthew Ramsey discuss the Labour Party's employment and labour law proposals.

Listen to the full episode.

See all policy in practice podcast episodes.

Settlement agreements

We've looked in previous editions at the scope of settlement agreements, particularly whether future claims can be included even if they are not in the contemplation of the parties when the agreement is signed.

The Scottish Court of Session confirmed recently that such claims could indeed be included as long as the drafting was clear enough. Strictly, Scottish decisions are not binding in England, so it is very helpful now to have an English decision confirming the same point. Clients should now be more confident that full and final settlements, or clean breaks, can be achieved.

Redundancy consultation

There is often a tension whenever redundancy exercises are in prospect between destabilising a wider workforce by putting a large number of roles at risk, and risking unfairness by notifying only those provisionally selected. Businesses are often tempted to go for the second option, particularly where the role that may be redundant is a unique one.

A recent case has increased the risk profile of that approach, emphasising that consultation when proposals are still at a formative stage is an essential part of a fair redundancy process, and that includes identification of the appropriate pool. Many employers are likely to want to continue a less destabilising approach, weighing the commercial drivers against the potential risk that might create. We are, of course, on hand to discuss options if your organisation is looking at this area.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More