ARTICLE
11 August 2026

Italian Data Protection Authority: Employee Monitoring Through Geolocation Systems

The Italian Data Protection Authority has ruled against an employer's use of GPS tracking systems in company vehicles, finding that continuous geolocation monitoring of employees violated GDPR principles. The decision examines the balance between legitimate business interests and workers' privacy rights, particularly regarding data minimisation and the requirement for Data Protection Impact Assessments in workplace surveillance scenarios.
Italy Employment and HR
DL-LAW Avvocati Giuslavoristi’s articles from DL-Law Avvocati Giuslavoristi are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • in United Kingdom
  • with readers working within the Pharmaceuticals & BioTech industries
DL-Law Avvocati Giuslavoristi are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR, Privacy and Tax topic(s)

With Decision No. 382/2026, the Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) found unlawful the processing of employees’ geolocation data carried out through a GPS tracking system installed in company vehicles.

In the case examined by the Authority, although a collective agreement had been concluded pursuant to Article 4 of the Workers’ Statute (Law No. 300/1970), the geolocation system recorded the vehicles’ position every 60 seconds and enabled real-time monitoring, resulting in the essentially continuous tracking of employees’ movements.

According to the Authority, such a configuration infringed the GDPR principles of data minimisation, proportionality and data protection by design.

The Authority also challenged the failure to carry out a prior Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) under Article 35 GDPR, despite the significant risks associated with the systematic monitoring of workers.

The Authority therefore: (i) held that the use of geolocation data for disciplinary purposes was unlawful, as the data had been collected through processing that was not compliant with data protection law and were therefore unusable pursuant to Article 4(3) of Law No. 300/1970; and (ii) notwithstanding the corrective measures subsequently implemented by the controller, found infringements of Articles 5, 6, 25, 35 and 88 GDPR, as well as Articles 113 and 114 of the Italian Privacy Code, and imposed an administrative fine of EUR 6,000.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More