Denied Relaxations In Government Tenders? Legal Remedies For MSMEs And Start-Ups In India

Government tenders are a lifeline for many Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and start-ups in India. Recognising their role in innovation and employment, Indian procurement law—through the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs (2012) and subsequent circulars—grants specific relaxations. These include exemptions from earnest money deposits (EMD), relaxation in turnover and prior experience criteria, and mandatory allocation of a percentage of procurement to MSMEs.

However, in practice, many MSMEs and start-ups face arbitrary denial of these relaxations by tendering authorities. This denial often forces smaller enterprises to compete on unequal terms against large corporates, defeating the very policy objective of supporting emerging businesses. When such exclusions occur, the only effective recourse is to invoke the tender litigation process in India.

Legal Framework for MSME & Start-up Relaxations in Tenders

The starting point for understanding MSME and start-up relaxations is the Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) Order, 2012, issued under the MSMED Act, 2006. This policy mandates that all central ministries, departments, and public sector undertakings procure at least 25% of their annual requirements from registered MSMEs. Out of this, 4% is earmarked for SC/ST entrepreneurs and 3% for women-owned enterprises.

Beyond the procurement share, the policy provides specific relaxations:

• Exemption from Earnest Money Deposit (EMD): Registered MSMEs are not required to furnish bid security.
• Relaxation in Prior Turnover and Experience Criteria: Start-ups and MSMEs can bid even if they lack the financial turnover or work experience otherwise required.
• Preference in Evaluation: Where MSMEs quote within a defined margin (generally 15%) of the lowest bidder, they may be awarded a portion of the contract.

For start-ups, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) has issued guidelines under the "Start-up India" framework. These enable procurement entities to waive prior experience and turnover conditions for start-ups engaged in innovative projects, subject to quality and technical parameters.

Despite this framework, denials are frequent. Tendering authorities sometimes insert restrictive clauses, misinterpret eligibility, or simply ignore government circulars. Such exclusions undermine policy intent and force affected bidders to seek relief through the tender litigation process in India.

Common Grounds for Denial of MSME & Start-up Relaxations

Even though the law is clear, MSMEs and start-ups routinely encounter rejection of their exemption claims. The reasons are often technical, and sometimes arbitrary:

1. Rigid Tender Conditions: Authorities may draft bid documents that insist on turnover, experience, or financial strength requirements—without incorporating the mandated relaxations.

2. Misinterpretation of Policy: Procurement officers occasionally argue that exemptions apply only to certain categories of tenders, or only at their discretion, even when circulars make them mandatory.

3. Documentation Issues: MSMEs or start-ups may be denied exemptions on the ground that their Udyam Registration Certificate, DPIIT recognition, or other proof is missing or outdated.

4. Sectoral Exclusions: In some high-value or technical procurements, tendering agencies attempt to exclude MSMEs/start-ups by citing "public interest" or "safety" concerns, even if such exclusions are not properly justified.

Discriminatory Application: At times, relaxations are extended to some bidders but denied to others under the same tender—resulting in a clear violation of equality under procurement law.

Such denials often leave small businesses at a competitive disadvantage. At this point, the only meaningful way to restore a level playing field is to trigger the tender litigation process in India by approaching the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution Act or by filing proceedings before competent forums, depending on the nature of the dispute.

Tender Litigation Process in India: Remedies Against Denial of Relaxations

When MSMEs and start-ups are denied statutory exemptions, the courts in India have consistently held that procurement authorities must adhere to the Public Procurement Policy and government circulars. The tender litigation process in India offers multiple remedies depending on the stage of the dispute:

1. Pre-bid Clarifications & Representations: Before litigation, bidders should file written objections during the pre-bid stage, pointing out non-compliance with MSME/start-up relaxations. This record often becomes crucial evidence later.

2. Writ Petitions under Article 226: Since tenders are issued by government authorities or PSUs, bidders can approach the jurisdictional High Court directly. Courts examine whether denial of relaxations amounts to arbitrariness or violation of procurement policy.

3. Injunctions & Interim Relief: In urgent cases, courts may grant interim relief, such as directing authorities to consider the bidder's MSME/start-up status or restraining them from finalizing the tender until the dispute is heard.

4. Judicial Review of Tender Terms: Indian courts generally refrain from interfering in tender conditions. However, when terms conflict with statutory MSME/start-up protections, courts have intervened to strike down or read down such clauses.

5. Post-award Remedies: If the contract has already been awarded, an aggrieved MSME or start-up may still file litigation to challenge the award and seek setting aside of the tender process on grounds of illegality or arbitrariness.

In practice, courts balance two competing concerns: protecting policy-mandated relaxations for MSMEs and start-ups, while ensuring that judicial intervention does not unduly delay public projects. This makes the tender litigation timelines and procedures critical for businesses seeking quick remedies.

Tender Litigation Timelines and Procedures in India

Tender disputes move on a compressed clock because procurement deadlines are tight and contracts often cannot be stalled for long. When MSMEs or start-ups decide to file tender litigation suit in India, the following timelines and procedures usually apply:

1. Immediate Action Post-Notice: The window between publication of a tender and bid submission is often short. If relaxations are denied in the tender document itself, objections must be raised at the pre-bid stage, usually within 7–10 days of the tender notice.

2. Approaching the High Court: Once bids are rejected or exemptions denied, the aggrieved bidder must promptly approach the jurisdictional High Court. Courts typically expect writ petitions to be filed within weeks, not months, as delay may make the challenge infructuous.

3. Interim Orders: Courts may pass interim orders within days—sometimes even on the very first hearing—directing the authority to consider the bidder's MSME/start-up status or restraining finalisation of the tender.

4. Final Disposal: Tender-related writs are treated as time-sensitive matters. High Courts often aim to dispose of them within one to three months, though timelines vary across jurisdictions.

5. Appeals and Higher Forums: If urgent relief is denied, parties may approach the Supreme Court. However, the Court rarely interferes unless there is glaring illegality, since tender processes are considered executive functions.

Procedurally, tender litigation requires careful drafting—highlighting how the denial of MSME or start-up relaxations contradicts statutory policies. Unlike ordinary civil litigation, these matters progress much faster, making readiness with documents (Udyam Registration, DPIIT certificate, pre-bid objections, correspondence with authorities) crucial.

Conclusion

For MSMEs and start-ups, government tenders can unlock scale and credibility. But when procurement authorities disregard statutory relaxations, the playing field tilts sharply against them.

Businesses facing arbitrary denials must act quickly: raise pre-bid objections, maintain complete documentation, and if necessary, file tender litigation suit in India without delay. Understanding the tender litigation process in India, as well as the tender litigation timelines and procedures, is crucial because procurement cases move faster than ordinary disputes.

The broader lesson is that litigation is not merely about defending rights in a single tender; it is about asserting a long-term presence in government procurement markets. MSMEs and start-ups that actively contest unlawful denials send a strong signal that statutory protections cannot be overlooked. By doing so, they not only safeguard their immediate business interests but also strengthen the legal ecosystem for all emerging enterprises in India.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.