ARTICLE
8 May 2026

Confiscation Orders Issued Against Company And Individual Convicted In 2024 Of Sanctions Offences

DM
Duane Morris LLP

Contributor

Duane Morris LLP, a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in offices across the United States and internationally, is asked by a broad array of clients to provide innovative solutions to today's legal and business challenges.
A Dutch court has ordered the confiscation of €165,826 from a company convicted of illegally exporting aircraft parts to Russian customers in violation of EU sanctions. The Rotterdam Court's ruling follows an earlier conviction and demonstrates the Netherlands' approach to calculating confiscation amounts by allowing deductible costs, ultimately seizing only the profit element rather than total revenue from the unlawful transactions.
Netherlands International Law
Duane Morris LLP are most popular:
  • within Law Department Performance topic(s)

Further to an earlier post relating to convictions of an individual and company obtained in October 2024 for supplying aircraft parts to Russian customers in breach of the EU’s sanctions, the Rotterdam Court has now ruled in the confiscation proceedings brought by the prosecution.

In the confiscation judgement against the (unnamed) company, the court ordered the confiscation of €165,826.

The court held that the revenue obtained from the sanctions breaches was €2,901,194, but allowed as “deductible costs” 82% of this amount, or €2,385,739. This is in line with the Dutch approach of allowing the convicted parties to break even on the unlawful transactions by confiscating not the illegally-obtained revenue (which the CJEU has held is a permissible approach), but rather the pure profit element.

The profit element was accordingly assessed as €515,455 which was divided between the convicted person and the convicted company.

In the second confiscation judgment against the individual, the same analysis was undertaken with the balance of €349,629 from the profits attributed to the individual. The judgment states that a further 599 days of jail time would be added to the existing sentence in the event that the confiscation order is not satisfied.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More