Pension plans face various types of risks, some of which can be mitigated or minimized by various de-risking strategies.
- Jeffrey P. Sommers, Partner in the Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group
In this episode of the Blakes Sound Business podcast, Blakes Partners Bonny Murray and Jeff Sommers discuss essential strategies for de-risking registered pension plans. Learn about buy-in and buy-out annuity contracts, longevity risk transfers and key considerations for plan administrators navigating the Canadian regulatory landscape. Gain practical insights from our market-leading lawyers to help manage risks and stay compliant.
Transcript
Nathan Kanter: Hi, I'm Nathan Kanter and
welcome to this episode of the Blakes Sound Business podcast.
Today, we're exploring an increasingly important topic for
pension plan administrators — de-risking registered pension
plans.
Joining me are Blakes Partners Bonny Murray from our Financial
Services group and Jeff Sommers from our Pensions, Benefits &
Executive Compensation group. They'll share their insights on
key strategies for de-risking a pension plan, including buy-in and
buy-out annuity contracts and longevity risk transfers, and
highlight what plan administrators need to know about the Canadian
regulatory landscape.
Let's get started.
[music]
Nathan: We often hear the term de-risking in the
context of registered pension plans, but what does that actually
mean, and what are the most common strategies for de-risking a
pension plan?
Jeff Sommers: Sure, well, let's start with
what we mean by de-risking. Pension plans face various types of
risks, some of which can be mitigated or minimized by various
de-risking strategies. For purposes of this podcast, we're
focusing on defined benefit pension plans. And the primary risks
that we're talking about addressing include longevity risk,
which is the risk that plan members will live longer than the
actuaries have estimated they will live, investment risk, which is
essentially that the rate of return on the plan's assets
won't be as high as expected, and interest rate risk, which is
essentially that long-term interest rates won't behave as
projected. The de-risking methods that we're going to discuss
today help reduce or minimize one or more of those risks, depending
on the particular method.
Bonny Murray: The most common methods of achieving
this pension de-risking are really by far utilizing buy-in and
buy-out annuity contracts. These are insurance products provided by
life insurance companies to the pension plan, or, less commonly,
longevity risk transfers. Those are also typically insurance
contracts issued by a life insurance company, but they can also be
structured as bank swaps or a swap with a non-insurance provider.
And we'll discuss all of these approaches on the
podcast.
Understanding and negotiating these products requires both
insurance and pension regulatory expertise, and Blakes is a market
leader in both of these areas. And so, that's why Jeff and I
are teaming up on the podcast today as we regularly work together
to assist pension and insurance clients with these kinds of
products.
Nathan: Can you walk us through the difference
between buy-in and buy-out annuity contracts and why that
distinction is important?
Jeff: Sure, well, let me start with buy-in
annuities. In a nutshell, what happens in the case of a buy-in
annuity is that the funding agent for the plan, which is typically
the trustee if the plan is funded through a trust, on the direction
from the plan administrator, will enter into a contract with an
insurance company under which the plan makes a single premium
payment to the insurer. And in return, the insurer becomes
responsible for paying to the pension plan the amount of the
monthly pension payments that become due to a defined pool of
retirees who are covered by the policy. And from a pension
regulatory perspective, a buy-in annuity is essentially an
investment of the pension plan, and it should be subject to all the
same levels of scrutiny as any other pension plan
investment.
From the member's perspective, it's essentially invisible.
The insurer is making the payment into the pension fund, and the
pension fund just continues to make the pension payments to the
member out of the plan. So, from a member's perspective,
nothing changes. They still get their pension every month from the
pension plan, it is completely invisible to them.
In terms of statutory discharges, which I'll get into more when
we talk about buy-out annuities, but the key thing from a buy-in
perspective is that there is no statutory discharge available under
pension legislation, so that is a notable difference. Essentially,
doing a buy-in annuity helps mitigate, as I mentioned, longevity
risk, investment risk and interest rate risk, at least with respect
to the particular pool of retirees who are covered by the
policy.
Bonny: And I'll add that, from an insurance
regulatory perspective, the buy-in annuity, it's a single bulk
annuity policy, again, issued by a life insurance company to the
pension plan. And there are limited compliance elements that apply,
so limited statutory requirements that we need to see in the policy
from an insurance perspective. But we do review these for clients
to make sure we have all of those requirements. And we do see a
fairly significant difference in the form of bulk annuity policies
that Canadian insurers will offer to pension plans for this
purpose. And so, Jeff and I regularly review these for pension plan
clients to help them figure out the benefits of the different forms
of policies and what will be most suitable for them.
Jeff: Great, now let's turn to buy-out
annuities. So, what happens in the case of a buy-out annuity is
very similar to the structure of a buy-in annuity, except in this
case, it's the plan administrator that enters into a contract
with a life insurance company, rather than the trustee or other
funding agent of the pension plan. And under that policy, a single
premium is paid by the plan to the insurer. And in exchange for
that, the insurer actually becomes responsible for paying the
monthly pensions as they come due directly to the pensioners who
are covered by the policy. So, the big difference here is that the
insurer is actually making the payments directly to the retirees
and not to the pension plan, as in the case of a buy-in
annuity.
And so, what happens here from a legal perspective is that the
buy-out annuity is essentially settling the benefits under the
plan. The insurer becomes responsible for directly making those
payments to the pensioners. This does involve a member
communication issue, obviously, because from the member's
perspective, it is changing. They're no longer going to get
their pension from their employer's pension plan. They're
going to be receiving their pension from the insurance company. So,
there's a communication aspect to this.
And from a pension legislation perspective, in some jurisdictions,
there's a statutory discharge, which I mentioned before,
available to the plan administrator. And what that essentially
means is that the pensions that are settled by the buy-out annuity
are no longer obligations of the plan and no longer need to be
reflected on future actuarial valuations and whatnot for the plan.
So those statutory discharges are very important to the plan
administrator. And from the administrator's perspective, you
should ensure that you satisfy the requirements in the particular
legislation to qualify for those discharges. And the discharge
requirements differ by jurisdiction, and it depends on the
jurisdiction in which the retiree was last employed, in respect of
their pension, and each jurisdiction that has discharge provisions
has different requirements, and so there is a fairly significant
legal exercise to go through to make sure that you satisfy all of
those requirements. So, it is highly recommended that you obtain
legal advice, and we've done this for many, many clients in
ensuring that that discharge is available and that you qualify for
it.
Bonny: And from an insurance regulatory
perspective, whereas the buy-in was a single bulk annuity policy
issued by the insurer, as Jeff said, the buy-out results in
individual annuities issued by the life insurance company to each
plan member. So, the members are now customers of the insurance
company. Again, when we're reviewing these for clients, we
might look at those annuity policies just to ensure that they meet
the limited statutory requirements.
Nathan: For plan administrators considering a
buy-in or buy-out annuity, what does the purchase process typically
involve?
Jeff: So, at a high level, the plan administrator
works with its actuaries, its consultants and its legal counsel,
all as part of deciding and executing the purchase of a buy-in or a
buy-out annuity. The first step is typically for the plan
administrator to analyze with its actuaries and its consultants
whether the purchase of a buy-in or buy-out makes sense in the
context of the particular plan, which also includes consideration
of any counting impact on the plan sponsor. But once you've
decided that it's the right thing to do for your particular
plan, the next step is typically to ensure that your plan data is
up to date. And after that, you work with your consultants,
typically, to help prepare a request for a quotation document. Your
consultants help you identify the insurers that might be interested
in participating in the bidding process. Essentially, you're
looking for initial, sort of, expressions of interest from
insurers.
Legal counsel sometimes retain to assist with the RFQ document. It
really does depend on the plan administrator. We recommend that you
do it, not that we draft that document, but that we at least review
it from a legal perspective.
The next step is typically that the insurers who are interested in
potentially bidding would provide the plan administrator with their
standard form contracts, either buy-in or buy-out, depending on the
situation. And that's another place where legal counsel, I
think, should get involved because what we do is we review those
template agreements at a very high level to do what we call a red
flag review to see if there's any key legal provisions that are
either missing or not worded the way you would like them worded.
And we have found that it's actually possible to negotiate with
insurers, even before the bids come in, that they'll agree to
make certain tweaks to their standard form contracts, so that as
the administrator, you get the comfort that the legal provisions
that you're going to be looking for will be agreed to by the
insurer.
Typically, then, the bidding process occurs so that the interested
insurance companies provide their bids. Bids are open for a very
short period of time, usually just a few hours. So, the plan
administrator needs to have its team in a war room somewhere, ready
to review and decide on various bids that come in. Legal counsel is
sometimes involved in that, but certainly your actuaries and your
consultants will be involved. And once you've decided who the
winning bidder is, you typically confirm that either through the
signing of an application with the insurer or sometimes it's as
informal as just sending an email confirmation.
The next step then is again cleaning the data and making sure that
the data that has been provided to the insurance company is correct
and actually negotiating the final contract with the winning
bidder. And that's where it's really important to have
legal counsel involved, as well as your actuaries and your
consultants, in negotiating the terms of that contract. And if
it's a buy-out policy, ensuring that all of the requirements
for a discharge under the applicable pension legislation have been
satisfied.
Nathan: Let's turn to another strategy
that's generating interest — longevity transfers. What
exactly are they, and how do they help pension plans manage
risk?
Bonny: Well, longevity risk, as Jeff said at the
top, is the risk of members living longer than the plan had
anticipated. And this is a big risk that pension plans face, and
pension plan sponsors typically aren't in the business of
estimating mortality. And so, a longevity transfer essentially
helps the pension plan manage that longevity risk while still
retaining control of the plan's investments. The transfer
mitigates against errors or volatility in the plan's current
estimations of life expectancy, as well as against future
improvements in life expectancy. And the transfer shifts the
longevity risk and this aspect of pension plan management from the
sponsor to a life insurer, which is in the business of estimating
mortality, and so, therefore better suited to take on that
longevity risk and manage it.
As I said, these are typically structured as insurance products and
offered by life insurers. They did originally emerge as bank swaps
where the bank was the counterparty, but these are very long-term
contracts. The contract essentially matches the lives of the people
covered under the contract. And so that ultimately made them less
attractive to banks from a capital perspective, and now they've
shifted and they're really primarily available as insurance
products.
Nathan: And how does a longevity transfer work in
practice? Can you explain the mechanics and how risk is
transferred?
Bonny: Yes, so the insurance product itself,
it's a contract between the life insurance company and the plan
sponsor, and it's structured as a swap — a swap of a
fixed payment leg and a floating payment leg. So, the pension plan
will identify the pool of members that it wants covered, just like
with a buy-in or buy-out. The insurer then assesses the longevity
risk of that pool, and they'll offer the pension plan a price
to take on the longevity risk. So that is a fixed price that the
pension plan will then pay to the insurer for the duration of that
longevity contract. So, it will be a premium payable at a certain
frequency. And like I said, the duration of the contract aligns
with the lives of the pool that have been identified. So, over the
course of the contract, the insurance company, in turn, will pay
the pension plan a floating amount that matches the actual pension
benefits payable to the covered members. So, pension plan pays
fixed amount to the insurance company, insurance company pays a
floating amount back to the pension plan, and then the pension plan
continues to pay out the benefits to members.
The fixed and floating legs are set so that the insurer is in the
money, is making a profit margin to start. And then the pension
plan is willing to pay that premium to have that certainty of
paying the fixed amount for the duration of the contract rather
than being exposed to the longevity, which provides uncertainty
into the future.
The long-term nature of the longevity contract does introduce some
complexity, and this all has to be accounted for in the contract.
So, for example, the accuracy of the member data is, of course,
critical to the insurer, and the contract will typically have very
detailed provisions relating to the initial and ongoing data
reviews and corrections. And depending on the materiality of
corrections that are made, this may impact pricing going forward.
There may be a pricing adjustment within the contract. The parties
will also typically have rights to conduct additional mortality
basis reviews at certain frequencies throughout the contract. Or
upon the happening of certain events or thresholds, and that may
alter the assessment of the longevity risk and may also result in a
pricing adjustment during the term of the contract.
The parties may implement a collateral structure that would secure
the divergence between the fixed and floating legs. And that
divergence, it may vary back and forth during the contract, and it
may become more material over time. And if the divergence, again,
crosses a certain degree threshold, it will often result in a reset
of the fixed-and-floating legs if that divergence becomes too
large. These collateral structures, I'll just say in
particular, can be tricky given, again, the parties we're
dealing with are pension plan insurance companies, they are subject
to regulations and those regulations do tend to impose some
limitation on granting collateral.
Jeff: I would just note that from a pension
regulatory perspective, longevity swaps are somewhat similar to
buy-in annuities. There is no statutory discharge available to the
plan administrator, and essentially that insurance contract or swap
contract is treated like an investment of the plan. As I mentioned,
with buy-in annuities, they should be subject to the same level of
scrutiny that other pension plan investments would also
involve.
Nathan: How common are longevity transfers in the
Canadian market today?
Bonny: Longevity transfers aren't overly
common in the Canadian market. You know, compared to the U.K.,
there's been a very active market in the U.K. for, you know,
going back 20 years. There's also been a market developing in
the U.S. There have been some significant longevity transfers in
Canada, but the market has not developed certainly to the same
extent as in the U.K. That's probably due to a combination of
factors like limitations in pension and insurance regulations, the
size and the nature of the pension plan market in Canada.
There's a tendency for Canadian pension plans to divide their
members into tranches and split that up among different insurers.
And of course, interest rates and other market factors at times can
make longevity pricing less attractive. They certainly can also be
daunting from a legal perspective due to the potential complexity
of the contract. That means higher legal fees to get these set up
and they are often perceived as much more complex compared to
buy-ins and buy-outs which have become much more
routine.
However, general market expectation is that pension risk transfer
activity in Canada will continue to be high over the next few
years, and so longevity transfers may be appropriate for certain
pension funds or certain parts of the plan. And while the legal
aspects can be complicated, Blakes has had the opportunity to
advise on most of the significant longevity transfers that have
taken place in Canada, so we're very well placed to help our
pension plan and insurance clients navigate these issues and use
these products when they're appropriate.
Nathan: If our listeners want to learn more about
these de-risking products, who should they reach out
to?
Jeff: Well, they can reach out to any member of
the Blakes Pension, Benefits & Executive Compensation group or
our Insurance Regulatory group. Those groups work very closely in
advising clients, and we have extensive experience in advising
clients on all of the products we talked about today. We've
certainly negotiated or helped clients negotiate buy-in and buy-out
annuity contracts opposite all of the major insurance companies
that operate in this space. So, we do have extensive experience,
and we'd be happy to assist anyone listening with navigating
the pension de-risking process and addressing the issues that
we've talked about today.
[music]
Nathan: Bonnie, Jeff, thank you for sharing your
insights today on pension plan de-risking.
Listeners, for more information on this topic and to explore other
episodes of the Blakes Sound Business podcast, please visit
blakes.com.
Until next time, take care.
[music]
For permission to reprint articles, please contact the bulletin@blakes.com Marketing Department.
© 2025 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.