ARTICLE
16 February 2016

Go-Karting Gone Awry In Ontario – Paid Volunteer Can Still Sue Race Track For Injuries

NR
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Contributor

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP logo
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. The firm has more than 4,000 lawyers and other legal staff based in Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa and the Middle East.
In what may be considered a particularly rare occasion, the Ontario Court of Appeal has addressed an employment law issue in the context of Go-Kart racing.
Canada Employment and HR

In what may be considered a particularly rare occasion, the Ontario Court of Appeal has addressed an employment law issue in the context of Go-Kart racing.

In this case, the appellant volunteered to be a "race director" for a Go-Kart race, for which he received a small stipend. When a Go-Kart driver crashed into hay bales that lined the corner of the race track, the appellant was injured. He sued both the employer and the Go-Kart driver for his injuries. His claim was dismissed in a summary judgment because he had signed a waiver releasing the employer from liability for any damages associated with the event, including the employer's negligence.

Ontario's Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (the "Act"), provides an insurance system for employees in specific industries that are outlined in the schedules to the Act. However, if an employee works for a company that isn't covered in those schedules, Part X, section 114(1) of the Act permits workers to sue their employers for workplace accidents that may arise due to a defect in workplace equipment or the employer's negligence.

The Court of Appeal found that it would be contrary to public policy to permit workers like the appellant to contract out of the Act. There is no clear indication in the Act that it permits employers and employees to contract out of its protective measures for injured workers, therefore its regime cannot be ousted by a simple waiver. The Court allowed the appeal – the appellant's case will now proceed to trial.

In light of this case, employers should re-consider any similar attempts to contract out of the Act's workplace safety regime – even for individuals who are merely volunteers who receive a stipend.

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members ('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More