Lessons from R. v. Greater Sudbury
Join Gowling WLG's construction workplace safety experts as they unpack the decade-long legal saga of R. v. Greater Sudbury. This landmark case has reshaped how "owner" responsibility is interpreted under Ontario's Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), particularly regarding control over contractors.
We'll discuss what the final rulings mean for owners, constructors and employers—and how businesses can proactively mitigate legal risks on construction projects moving forward.
Agenda
- Case overview: A brief history of v. Greater Sudbury and its impact on construction law
- Expanded definition of "employer": Why owners may now hold OHSA responsibilities, even without direct control
- The role of due diligence: Why documented efforts to ensure safety and manage contractors are now under greater scrutiny
- Practical risk management: Best practices for selecting, overseeing and documenting contractor relationships
- Implications for future projects: What owners and constructors should do now to minimize liability exposure
Explore our latest article for a deeper understanding of this important ruling.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.
Read the original article on GowlingWLG.com
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
