ARTICLE
23 January 2020

Supreme Court Of Canada Releases Administrative Law Judgments Revising Standard Of Review

OW
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP

Contributor

Oyen Wiggs LLP is a Vancouver-based independent intellectual property boutique law firm in Canada. We are experienced patent lawyers with a variety of technical backgrounds that provide us with the insight to help our clients define and protect their innovations. Through our wide-reaching network of foreign associates, we advance our clients’ interests around the world.
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued two judgments that address how the decisions of administrative bodies should be reviewed by the courts
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of Canada has issued two judgments that address how the decisions of administrative bodies should be reviewed by the courts: Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 (Vavilov) and Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 66. These decisions prescribe a new test for determining the standard of review that should be used, replacing the previous test adopted in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9. We anticipate that the approach that the Federal Court takes when reviewing decisions of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office and its tribunals will be affected by these decisions.

Supreme Court Of Canada Releases Administrative Law Judgments Revising Standard Of Review

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More