ARTICLE
16 March 2020

Trademark And Bad Faith

Re-filing identical marks a few years after the first filing with a wider list of goods and services to avoid having to prove the use of the brand at the end of the five-year grace period.
European Union Intellectual Property
Elvinger Hoss Prussen’s articles from ELVINGER HOSS PRUSSEN, société anonyme are most popular:
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Securities & Investment industries
ELVINGER HOSS PRUSSEN, société anonyme are most popular:
  • within Antitrust/Competition Law, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration and International Law topic(s)

Be aware: The following practice is not authorised (at least for EU trademarks)

Re-filing identical marks a few years after the first filing with a wider list of goods and services to avoid having to prove the use of the brand at the end of the five-year grace period.

(Decision of one of the EUIPO's Boards of Appeal (Case number: R1849/2017-2): partial invalidation for bad faith).

Which requirements for a finding of bad faith?

On 12 September 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") has decided in its case C 104/18t that when seeking a declaration of invalidity on the grounds of bad faith, there is no need for the applicant to have similar/identical goods and services.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More