ARTICLE
8 November 2012

AFM Orders Hypothecaire Vastgoed Obligaties To Disclose Information Regarding Two Investment Funds

DB
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V.

Contributor

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek is a leading international law firm, trusted by clients for over 150 years due to its deep engagement with their businesses and a clear understanding of their ambitions. While rooted in Dutch society, the firm offers global coverage through its network of top-tier law firms, ensuring seamless, tailored legal solutions. De Brauw’s independence enables it to choose the best partners while remaining a trusted, strategic advisor to clients worldwide.

The firm emphasizes long-term investment in both its client relationships and its people. De Brauw’s legal training institutes, De Brauwerij and The Brewery, cultivate diverse talent, preparing the next generation of top-tier lawyers through rigorous training and personal development. Senior leadership traditionally rises from within, maintaining the firm’s high standards and collaborative culture.

The AFM issued an order under pain of penalty on 13 September 2012 to Hypothecaire Vastgoed Obligaties III en IV ("HVO"), part of Regge Vastgoed.
Netherlands Criminal Law

The AFM issued an order under pain of penalty on 13 September 2012 to Hypothecaire Vastgoed Obligaties III en IV ("HVO"), part of Regge Vastgoed.

The AFM was of the opinion that HVO had been negligent in failing to provide information to investors. According to the AFM, HVO failed to disclose that the HVO III fund had not obtained a bank guarantee to secure interest payments, even though the prospectus stated that it did have this guarantee. The HVO III and IV funds together raised EUR 3.2 million from investors, of which EUR 1.5 was transferred to Regge Zekerheidsholding BV instead of HVO Germany, contrary to what the prospectus stated.

The AFM also ordered that balance sheet positions and available liquid assets of various companies be disclosed so that bond holders could determine their position.

HVO applied for summary relief against the AFM's order, but this application was rejected.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More