ARTICLE
6 November 2015

High Rate Of I-9 Violations Does Not Necessarily Show Bad Faith

FR
Fox Rothschild LLP

Contributor

Who We Are

With bold growth, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a national law firm combined with the personal touch and connections of a boutique firm.

Our Mission

Solving problems is our top priority. We invest the time to get to know you and understand your needs. We work hard to win every client’s loyalty. We do that by providing creative solutions and excellent client service.

In a recent OCAHO decision, the Administrative Law Judge found that the even 90% I-9 violation rate is not sufficient to show bad faith and reduced the fine from $30,574.50 to $14,600.
United States Immigration
Fox Rothschild LLP are most popular:
  • within Immigration, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Automotive, Basic Industries and Insurance industries

In a recent OCAHO decision, the Administrative Law Judge found that the even 90% I-9 violation rate is not sufficient to show bad faith and reduced the fine from $30,574.50 to $14,600.

In the case U.S. vs. Horno MSJ, Ltd., Company, the company is found to be liable for thirty-two violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(a)(1)(B). In the process of penalty assessment, ALJ considered the following factors: "1) the size of the employer's business, 2) the employer's good faith; 3) the serious of the violations, 4) whether or not the individual was an unauthorized alien, and 5) the employer's history of previous violations" under 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(e)(5).

ALJ found that the employer, Horno MSJ, Ltd. "is a small family business with no history of previous violations; the company is a quintessential 'mom and pop' operation that is modest both in terms of its number of employees as well as its resources" Although serious substantive violations had been found, such as failures to complete the Section 1 status box, to sign in section 2, and to record information in List A, B or C, the ALJ was not convinced by the government that the high rate of violations "demonstrates that Horno was not engaged in a good faith effort to comply with the law." The ALJ stated that "OCAHO case law has long held that bad faith requires a showing of culpable conduct beyond merely a high rate of violations, and that even a dismal rate of I-9 compliance is not sufficient to make that showing." Even though the unauthorized employment was found, ALJ found that the government did not prove all of its allegations. In conclusion, ALJ emphasized that the purpose of the penalty is to deter future violations but not to be "unduly punitive". As such, the ALJ adjusted the rate of penalty to the midrange of the penalty schedule and significantly reduced almost 50% from the penalty ICE seeks.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More