ARTICLE
10 December 2014

Wire Fraud Charges Against Former Lilly Scientists Are Dismissed

FR
Fox Rothschild LLP

Contributor

Who We Are

With bold growth, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a national law firm combined with the personal touch and connections of a boutique firm.

Our Mission

Solving problems is our top priority. We invest the time to get to know you and understand your needs. We work hard to win every client’s loyalty. We do that by providing creative solutions and excellent client service.

Charges against two former Eli Lilly scientists were dismissed by the federal government. According to court documents, the two were accused of wire fraud for allegedly leaking proprietary information about experimental drugs and providing the data to a Chinese drug maker.
United States Criminal Law
Fox Rothschild LLP are most popular:
  • within Immigration, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Automotive, Basic Industries and Insurance industries

Alain Leibman was quoted in the Wall Street Journal Pharmalot article, "Wire Fraud Charges Against Former Lilly Scientists are Dismissed."  Full text can be found in the December 8, 2014, issue, but a synopsis is noted below.  

Charges against two former Eli Lilly scientists were dismissed by the federal government.  According to court documents, the two were accused of wire fraud for allegedly leaking proprietary information about experimental drugs and providing the data to a Chinese drug maker.  

The case garnered headlines when the initial charges were announced and cited as another example of the need to guard trade secrets owned by U.S. life sciences and tech industries. Lilly then estimated the value of the confidential information to be worth $65 million.  According to Alain Leibman, an attorney for Cao, both are naturalized U.S. citizens. 

Leibman notes that the dismissal confirms the former Lilly scientist "did nothing wrong... He did not disclose anything proprietary or exchange or provide any confidential information that belonged to Lilly."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More