ARTICLE
23 October 2015

3D Printing And IP Rights: The Elephant In The Room

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
People who write about 3D printing often say that it raises unique intellectual property issues, but then stop there. But what is different about 3D printing from an IP perspective?
United States Intellectual Property

People who write about 3D printing often say that it raises unique intellectual property issues, but then stop there. But what is different about 3D printing from an IP perspective? IP legal principles apply to 3D printing no differently than they apply to any other technology. Yet there is an elephant in the 3D printed room because the difference is really an order of magnitude: 3D printing may involve all types of IP rights and most products, so the scale and scope of potential infringement and the pool of potential infringers is much larger. In this article, Finnegan attorney  John F. Hornick discusses IP considerations in the 3D printing industry.

Previously published by Santa Clara Law Review

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More