ARTICLE
11 May 2020

Nike V. Adidas: The PTAB Can Sua Sponte Raise Arguments For Substitute Claims

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") may sua sponte raise a new ground of unpatentability for substitute...
United States Intellectual Property

In Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") may sua sponte raise a new ground of unpatentability for substitute claims when the prior art is of record and the parties have adequate notice and an opportunity to respond. The Federal Circuit found that the PTAB had not provided the parties an adequate opportunity to respond, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, so it remanded the case for the Board to do so.  For additional details, please see the related post on Finnegan's Federal Circuit IP Blog.

Originally published 16 April, 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More