ARTICLE
16 September 2024

Nestle, Nespresso Axe Two K-Fee Coffee Pod Patents At Tribunal

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
Nespresso USA Inc. persuaded an administrative tribunal to invalidate two K-fee System GmbH patents related to single-serve coffee capsules and a beverage system.
United States California Intellectual Property

Nespresso USA Inc. persuaded an administrative tribunal to invalidate two K-fee System GmbH patents related to single-serve coffee capsules and a beverage system.

K-fee's US Patent Nos. 11,230,430 and 10,994,923 are obvious in light of four previous inventions because an individual experienced in mechanical beverage systems likely would've combined them to create the challenged patents, according to two Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions issued Tuesday.

K-fee, a subsidiary of Kruger GmbH & Co. KG that makes coffee and espresso pods, sued the Nestlé SA subsidiary in January 2022, alleging infringement of three patents. The US District Court for the Central District of California stayed the lawsuit in September 2022 pending Nespresso's PTAB petitions. The board upheld the validity of the third patent, US Patent No. 11,254,491, in April. Nespresso's appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remains pending.

  • The ‘430 patent covers a beverage system including a single-serve capsule with a bar code and a beverage machine, and the ‘923 patent details a single-serve capsule.
  • The board concluded K-fee's expert wasn't qualified to offer testimony from the perspective of a person having ordinary skill in the art because his evidence of experience in the design of mechanical beverage systems or similar products was insufficient.
  • A jury trial in the parallel litigation is tentatively scheduled to begin in August 2025.
  • Administrative Patent Judges Jon B. Tornquist, Grace Karaffa Obermann, and James J. Mayberry joined the decisions.

Mayer Brown LLP represents Nespresso. McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Alston & Bird LLP, and The Dobrusin Law Firm represent K-Fee.
The cases are:

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2024. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More