ARTICLE
31 August 2026

Takeda Files BPCIA Suit Against Polpharma Biologics For Vedolizumab Biosimilar

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
Takeda Pharmaceuticals has initiated the first BPCIA litigation involving a vedolizumab biosimilar, filing suit against Polpharma Biologics over its PB016 product. The case centers on six patents related to ENTYVIO treatment methods and dosing regimens, with Polpharma's aBLA approval anticipated in May 2027. Takeda seeks injunctive relief and damages to prevent commercialization of the biosimilar product.
United States New Jersey Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Michael Shriner’s articles from Goodwin Procter LLP are most popular:
  • within Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
  • in India
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services industries
Goodwin Procter LLP are most popular:
  • within Criminal Law, Accounting and Audit and Law Practice Management topic(s)

On August 26, 2026, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG (collectively, “Takeda”) filed a BPCIA complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Polpharma Biologics S.A. (“Polpharma”), alleging that Polpharma’s vedolizumab biosimilar, PB016, will infringe six patents related to Takeda’s ENTYVIO (vedolizumab). This is the first BPCIA case involving a vedolizumab biosimilar.

Takeda alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,663,579; 10,004,808; 12,053,526; 12,171,832; 12,544,445; and 12,622,969, all generally related to methods of treatment, or methods of “achieving clinical response” or “inducing clinical remission” using a certain dosing regimen with vedolizumab.

Takeda alleges that Polpharma announced a partnership with Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC in 2025 to commercialize PB016 and has submitted an abbreviated Biologics License Application (“aBLA”) to market the product. Takeda also alleges that, on June 18, 2026, Polpharma provided Notice of Commercial Marketing, stating that it intends to commence commercial marketing of PB016 no earlier than 180 days from that date. According to Takeda, “counsel for Polpharma informed counsel for Takeda that approval of Polpharma’s aBLA is expected in May 2027.”

Takeda seeks a declaratory judgment that Polpharma has infringed or will infringe the asserted patents, an injunction to prevent Polpharma from manufacturing, using, offering to sell, selling, distributing, and importing any current or future version of PB016, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

Stay tuned to Big Molecule Watch for further updates on this new BPCIA litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More